Advertisement

The Mayans: A New Force in Guatemalan Politics

Share
<i> Victor Perera, who teaches at the Graduate School of Journalism at UC Berkeley, is the author of "Unfinished Conquest: The Guatemalan Tragedy" and "Rites: A Guatemalan Boyhood," due out in paperback from Mercury House next fall</i>

A new, indigenous opposition is emerging in Guatemala that could determine the fate of President Ramiro de Leon Carpio’s anti-corrup tion constitutional reforms, ap proved last Sunday in a referendum that attracted fewer than 20% of the country’s eligible voters. More significant, this coalition of Mayan popular groups could dictate the terms for the next round of peace talks, set later this month in Mexico City, between the Guatemalan government and the leftist guerrillas of the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Union. Previous negotiations broke down over the issue of accountability for human-rights violations against the Mayan communities.

Last June, delegates from four indigenous organizations met in the offices of the National Committee of Guatemalan Widows to elect the leaders of the new coalition. The three organizations, in addition to the Widows, were the Communities of Population in Resistance, the Runujel Junam Council of Ethnic Communities and the Permanent Commission for Refugees, which oversees the repatriation of 45,000 Guatemalans who have lived in camps along the Mexican border for more than a decade. A fifth member of the coalition, which did not send a delegate, is the Group of Mutual Support, composed of families of Guatemalans disappeared by the military.

The emerging Mayan coalition represents an interesting historical convergence; each of these organizations, headed by indigenous Mayan militants, has been associated with the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Union. The alliance entered into by these groups thus amounts to a joint declaration of independence from their guerrilla mentors.

Advertisement

Of the five groups, the Communities of Population in Resistance is the largest and most disciplined. Its origins date from the military’s counterinsurgency campaign of the late 1970s and early ‘80s. The scorched-earth practices introduced by President Romeo Lucas Garcia and expanded under evangelical President Efrain Rios Montt destroyed more than 440 villages and killed an estimated 60,000 Highland Mayas. Another million and a half were forced to leave their homes, with as many as two-thirds fleeing into Mexico. Most continued north.

The other half-million Guatemalans who fled became internal refugees, or desplazados . The majority drifted to Guatemala City and smaller towns, where they scratch out menial livings.

About 50,000 Mayas from the northern and western Highlands fled to a lowland zone of northern Quiche Department known as Ixcan, where they survived on a bare-subsistence diet. These desplazados joined together to form the Communities of Population in Resistance. In the early years, they maintained their solidarity with the leftist guerrillas who had been active in their home villages. Early visitors to the Ixcan were often greeted by raised fists and shouted Marxist slogans, mixed with a humbling and open-handed Mayan hospitality.

A Chinese-Guatemalan investigator, Myrna Mack Chang, was among the first to bring the Communities to the attention of the outside world. Her report was careful not to blame the military directly for the plight of these displaced Mayas; nevertheless, her implicit denunciation cost Myrna Mack her life.

The evolution of the Communities of Population into a close-knit, disciplined organization is one of the intriguing stories of contemporary Guatemala. Today, the army continues to harass the group with bombing raids and public-relations jibes depicting them as handmaidens of armed subversion. Representatives of international organizations, including a human-rights special envoy from the United Nations, have visited these communities. They have been astounded by their high morale and tight discipline.

The Communities of Population’s chief objective, apart from survival, is to call the world’s attention to the atrocities committed by the army against Highland Mayan communities, in its pursuit of victory over the leftist guerrillas who used the Mayan villages as their bases of popular support.

Advertisement

Each of the organizations is working to expand the political space, or apertura , by attacking the most repressive institutions of the Guatemalan army. The Runujel Junam Council of Ethnic Communities, focuses on dismantling the army’s unconstitutional civil-defense patrols, which enlist hundreds of thousands of Highland Mayas to carry out the military’s dirty work of counterinsurgency.

The Permanent Commission on Refugees has collaborated with the United Nations to resettle nearly 5,000 of the 45,000 Guatemalans in Mexican camps. Thousands more are streaming back since the uprising by fellow Mayas of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation in Chiapas on Jan. 1. The head of the Permanent Commission, Ricardo Curtz, has resisted the army’s attempts to sow dissension among the refugees by accusing their leaders of collaborating with the guerrillas. Most of the repatriated Guatemalans have settled in the Ixcan, a few hours’ walk from the Communities of Population in Resistance. The two groups’ proven ability to survive under impossibly harsh conditions, plus their shared history of persecution by the army, make them natural allies.

The National Committee of Guatemalan Widows, headed by the resolute Cakchiquel Mayan former widow, Rosalina Tuyuc, has earned the army’s sworn enmity by her efforts to abolish the forced recruitment of teen-age Highland males, whose communal bonds are systematically broken by military training before they are sent back to the Highlands as soldiers to prey on their own people.

The election of delegates in the National Committee of Guatemalan Widows’ offices was particularly impressive for its attention to democratic procedure. With the possible exception of Rigoberta Menchu’s 1992 Nobel Peace prize, no other event highlights more dramatically the preponderance of human rights in the emergence of a New Maya from the ashes of the military’s 30-year war of counterinsurgency.

The new Mayan opposition made its influence felt in the low turnout in last Sunday’s referendum. The 43 constitutional amendments approved by the voters called for the dissolution of congress and the supreme court. But although they included concessions to the chambers of commerce and finance, the reforms did not address the issues embodied by the new coalition: the abolition of civil-defense patrols; the end of forced military recruitment; the appointment of an independent truth commission to investigate human-rights violations; agrarian reform and other economic incentives for Guatemala’s indigenous majority. In coming weeks, as De Leon attempts to enforce the reforms, his shaky presidency may depend increasingly for its survival on the support of Menchu and the opposition.

The aging guerrilla leaders headed for the peace talks will also have to take the new Mayan coalition into account, if they, the Guatemalan government and the mediators for both sides hope to bring Latin America’s longest-lasting undeclared war to a merciful end.*

Advertisement
Advertisement