Advertisement

COMMENTARY : Some Issues Deeper Than Black and White

Share
WASHINGTON POST

Every time there is some firestorm involving words, particularly words that suggest prejudice and bigotry, or at the least insensitivity, I try to put things into perspective by recalling what our parents used to tell us when we were kids: Sticks and stones may break your bones, but words will never hurt you.

Not true. Words can hurt like hell. Sometimes they wound, even paralyze. Especially when spoken by people we believe ought to be more responsible, when spoken by someone such as a university president.

All of your life you’re told education is the way up, the way out, the way to get away from all the garbage, from the Archie Bunkers and Jimmy the Greeks and Al Campanises. Then you get to the state university of New Jersey and hear the president, Francis Lawrence, say this: “genetic, hereditary background.” They hurt. Just like Campanis’ “lacking the necessities.”

Advertisement

One reaction is to say, “I am not about to get myself all riled up over some stupid remark by a man who is either that ignorant, that mean, or that naive. His views don’t change what I think of myself, and wasting one second of energy even thinking about what he said is time that could be put to better use.”

The other is to say, “What he said causes pain and injury and anybody in that position of responsibility ought to be held accountable for his actions, and to do anything less than scream bloody murder is to acquiesce.”

Every time there is a new episode like this I say I’m not going to get all riled up again, but inevitably wind up almost violently angry in a few short hours. Obviously those 150 demonstrators who stopped the Rutgers-Massachusetts game Tuesday night reached a boiling point too.

I wouldn’t recognize Francis Lawrence if he walked into my living room this moment, but I do know some of the people who say his track record when it comes to helping minority students is anywhere from excellent to superior. By virtue of that alone, I’m not going to join the chorus calling for him to be fired.

Black men who don’t dribble or tackle rarely even get into colleges these days, and if Lawrence is a man whose actions help a few gain a formal education, then we may have to suffer some of his words. I’d rather put up with him than somebody promising 40 acres and a mule who has no intentions of delivering.

But. If Lawrence had sought out groups of students and apologized to them -- not to a governor -- I’d bet there would never have been a demonstration. A touch of sincere damage control could have gone a long, long way. What Lawrence said doesn’t offend me nearly as much as officials in the Rutgers athletic department reportedly telling members of the basketball team they are not to talk about the situation. Or even worse, that there could be consequences for those who do.

Advertisement

It’s amazing how, for all their physical prowess, black athletes at predominantly white schools are generally the meekest people on campus. All it takes is one player with moderate courage to say to any reporter, “My coach has threatened to take away my scholarship if I come out in support of the demonstrators or say one word about this.”

You know what happens next? Coach fired, AD fired, student reinstated and lauded by everybody. As is, in their frightened silence, too many leave school like Stepin Fetchit, completely uninformed and dispassionate about the issues that affect everybody in this world not protected by a basketball court or football field.

Ultimately, this isn’t about Rutgers or some silly basketball game or even Francis Lawrence, but about how we deal with people who continue to spread prejudice and ignorance with words that hurt. It’s about the stereotypical notions that too many people have about one another. And it’s about one of the responses, the loud response, the one that says, “If you continue to put these ideas out there for public consumption, where they can hurt people, I’m going to come back swinging.”

What happened at Rutgers isn’t isolated. Two weeks ago in Miami during Super Bowl week, I got together with five friends, all between the ages of 33 and 36, all black males, all doing exceptionally well in their chosen professions by any standard.

One is an investment banker, another a venture capitalist, another a manufacturing executive, still another a lawyer, and one is the international marketing director for one of the most well-known companies in the world. The least formally educated of the six is the newspaper columnist, which is to say the only one with merely an undergraduate degree. The average income in the group was well in excess of $100,000. Yet wherever we went, people asked, “Excuse me, who do you play for?” At the restaurant it was “Who do you play for?” At the health club it was “Who do you play for?” Shopping in Bar Harbor it was “Who do you play for?”

Everywhere we went, literally, there was some white person presuming we were athletes. Never presumed any one of us was a surgeon or a banker. Only an athlete. If you’re a young, prosperous-looking black man in America, what else could you be but an athlete, right? What else could you do to be this successful besides dunk or tackle somebody, or maybe rap? It must be our “genetic, hereditary background,” I guess. Don’t get me wrong. I’d trade this laptop in a nanosecond for Charles Barkley’s talent, but that’s not the point. The point is, too many white people can still see black people make money with their bodies but not their minds. Nobody black ever asks me (or any of the rest of us, for that matter) who I play for, which is pretty interesting, or pretty obvious.

Advertisement

By now, after 15 years of this, I probably should be over getting angry. I probably should be able to say to myself, “He’s an idiot. What do you care what he presumes about you?”

But I can’t. Just as those Rutgers students couldn’t. The waitress at a cafe on Miami Beach came to the table and said that “a model, the one with the blond hair, didn’t understand why you just wouldn’t be honest and tell who you played for.” I introduced the waitress, one by one, to the investment banker, the lawyer, the venture capitalist, the manufacturing executive, the international marketing executive. She looked at me as if I was making up these occupations. Linebacker was something she could have accepted, I think. I got so angry I couldn’t see. On the credit-card slip I left her a tip of one cent. That was my protest. I’m too old to sit in.

Advertisement