Advertisement

Drug Runners Arrested at Border Often Go Free

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

During the federal government’s yearlong narcotics crackdown along the Southwest border, hundreds of suspected smugglers have been allowed to go free after U.S. authorities arrested them with substantial quantities of drugs at ports of entry in California.

In the past year, about 2,300 suspected traffickers were taken into custody for bringing drugs across the border but, according to records and interviews, more than one in four were simply sent home to Mexico because of jail overcrowding and prosecutorial discretion.

For the record:

12:00 a.m. May 29, 1996 For the Record Times Article Misstated Guidelines on Border Drug Cases
Los Angeles Times Wednesday May 29, 1996 Home Edition Part A Page 3 Metro Desk 12 inches; 408 words Type of Material: Correction
A Times article disclosing the release of hundreds of Mexicans detained at the border on suspicion of drug smuggling misstated federal guidelines for prosecuting seizures.
The May 12 article--which touched off partisan political fighting over the Clinton administration’s drug policy--inaccurately described a program under which federal authorities since 1994 have sent more than 1,000 drug suspects back to Mexico.
The guidelines state that prosecutors may decide not to press charges if five criteria are met. The suspect must be a first-time offender and a Mexican national and be caught with less than 125 pounds of marijuana. There also must be insufficient evidence of criminal intent, and the suspect must have little or no information about organized smuggling. Those suspects who meet all five criteria could be sent back to Mexico, and their green cards or border crossing cards confiscated.
The article, which was based on interviews with federal officials, did not list all five criteria and incorrectly implied that marijuana cases involving less than 125 pounds were not prosecuted. When The Times later obtained a copy of the internal guidelines, they were reported, as were statistics showing that the U.S. attorney’s office in San Diego and the local district attorney have prosecuted hundreds of cases involving less than 125 pounds of marijuana.
In discussing the weight guideline, the article erroneously indicated that it applies to U.S. citizens, as well as Mexican nationals, and a number of cases involving U.S. citizens were cited to make various points.
The examples illustrating lack of prosecution contained incomplete or inaccurate information, because some records pertaining to those cases could not be found or were not publicly available. The U.S. attorney’s office, citing privacy concerns, had declined to reveal specific reasons for rejecting prosecution.
In one misreported case, a U.S. citizen with arrests in January and February was charged in both instances, and prosecutors say he will be charged in a third case pending a competency hearing. A U.S. citizen with a prior smuggling conviction was charged following an arrest in March with 68 pounds of marijuana. In another case, in which charges were dismissed against a woman defendant in a 158-pound cocaine seizure, the article should have added that her co-defendant said the woman had no knowledge of the drugs. He was subsequently sentenced to prison.
In all, federal officials say, four of the eight cases in the article resulted in felony charges. Of the other four, the district attorney in San Diego rejected one case for insufficient evidence, the U.S. attorney rejected two on the same grounds and the investigation continues in the other.
“We

Two suspects with 32 pounds of methamphetamine, and another with 37,000 Quaalude tablets, were simply “excluded” from the United States after their drugs and vehicles were confiscated.

Advertisement

The handling of drug cases at the border, most involving at least 50 pounds of marijuana, reflects shifting and sometimes conflicting pressures on the federal law enforcement community.

The threshold for prosecutions, drug agents say, has risen as the government has stepped up narcotics interdiction at border crossings and made more seizures. In addition, they say there often is no room for drug suspects at the federal jail here because it is overflowing with people awaiting trial on immigration law violations and other charges.

After a seizure of 158 pounds of cocaine, one defendant was cited and released because there was no room at the federal jail, said the woman’s attorney. The charges against her were dropped, the attorney added.

Officials at the U.S. attorney’s office confirm that under a program quietly adopted two years ago, an increasing number of suspected traffickers have been sent back to Mexico without arrest or prosecution in either federal or state court. Instead, they are prohibited from returning to this country pending an immigration hearing.

Government figures show that more than 1,000 smuggling suspects have been processed this way since 1994 after seizures by the U.S. Customs Service and the Border Patrol.

The number of such cases rose from 215 in 1994 to 636 last year at San Ysidro, Tecate and Otay Mesa. There were 288 cases in the first four months of 1996--and officials project that the total will reach more than 800 for the year.

Advertisement

“This is, in our opinion, a powerful prosecutorial tool,” Assistant U.S. Atty. John Kramer said in an interview. “Immigration exclusion cases principally involve first-time offenders who face the sanction of losing permanent residency in the United States or their border crossing cards.”

Justice Department and U.S. Customs Service officials have reported unprecedented drug seizures in the first year of Operation Hard Line, an anti-drug program along the entire border with Mexico. Last year, they said, total drug seizures from vehicles, cargo containers and pedestrians at all ports were up 25% over the previous year.

“To the extent that drug seizures are up, there is perhaps the perception that we’re not doing more in the prosecuting area [but] more felony cases have been filed than ever before,” Kramer said.

The overall number of felony drug prosecutions originating from border arrests more than doubled in San Diego County, Kramer said, with almost two-thirds prosecuted in state court.

The government’s “exclusion policy” has caused frustration among some Customs inspectors, who are making increasing numbers of seizures. After two Mexican women with 32 pounds of methamphetamine and 24 pounds of marijuana were sent back across the border, one inspector wrote in an Aug. 13, 1995, report:

“Lack of enforcement is not because inspectors aren’t trying. It’s because of the policy coming from upstairs.”

Advertisement

Anyone caught smuggling drugs, even a single marijuana cigarette, can be charged with a felony offense, carrying a minimum of two years in prison, or a misdemeanor, carrying up to a year in jail.

But since the early 1990s, the U.S. attorney’s office has struggled with its inability to prosecute all drug cases--especially marijuana cases--because of inadequate resources. Officials previously had set loose guidelines for deciding whether to seek misdemeanor or felony charges, depending on the amount of marijuana.

Now, officials say the U.S. Customs Service is operating under guidelines limiting any prosecution--including misdemeanors--to cases involving 125 pounds of marijuana or more.

And Mexican nationals who are first-time offenders usually are taken before an immigration judge and given the option of being excluded from the country, pending an immigration appeal, or of being prosecuted. So far, officials said, no one has chosen prosecution.

“Generally prosecution is deferred if the amount is below 125 pounds, or if the defendant is a Mexican citizen, or if in the opinion of the prosecutor, it’s not a strong case,” said Jeff Casey, Customs deputy special agent in charge in San Diego.

However, Kramer said, suspects who escape prosecution for their first seizure will automatically be charged if they are caught a second time, regardless of the drug type or quantity.

Advertisement

U.S. Customs Service records reviewed by The Times show that some smugglers have been caught two or more times--even in the same week--yet still were not jailed or prosecuted. In addition, no action was taken against a number of suspected smugglers captured with more than 125 pounds of marijuana.

One 58-year-old U.S. citizen, according to seizure records, was arrested three times this year at the border--in January with 53 pounds of marijuana, in February with 51 pounds and this month with 41 pounds. Although he had a criminal history that stretched back four decades and included an alien smuggling charge, he was not prosecuted for the first two seizures, according to a law enforcement source.

In one case that exceeded the threshold, records show that two U.S. citizens arrested Oct. 22, 1995, for smuggling 151 pounds of marijuana were not prosecuted. And neither was a 21-year-old U.S. citizen arrested March 16 with 386 pounds of marijuana who had been caught a week earlier with a smaller amount.

Citing privacy concerns, the U.S. attorney’s office declined to state the reasons why specific cases were not prosecuted.

“If a person is arrested at the border and a case isn’t filed, sometimes there are legitimate law enforcement reasons to do that,” Kramer said. “The point is, there are a number of reasons other than not wanting to go forward with the case.”

Some federal law enforcement officials have complained that lack of jail space has forced them to release drug suspects outright or issue them citations, which are also promises to appear in court.

Advertisement

A pregnant woman arrested with 1.2 pounds of heroin Nov. 25 was fingerprinted and issued a notice to appear in court. The seizure occurred at 1:30 p.m., but the agent noted in an arrest affidavit that the federal jail “was at full capacity” and the suspect could not be incarcerated.

Kramer acknowledged that prosecutors and law enforcement agents are sometimes “forced to make hard decisions because of a lack of bed space” at the jail. But, he added, “If there is a belief that our emphasis on immigration prosecutions has detracted us from felony prosecutions of drug cases, that assumption is incorrect.”

One cause of the overcrowding, critics say, is Operation Gatekeeper, a controversial crackdown on illegal immigration that has helped fill the local federal jail.

Last week, 49% of the 930 inmates housed at the Metropolitan Correction Center were charged with immigration law violations, while 36% were being held for drug offenses, said a spokeswoman.

Mario Conte, head of the Federal Defenders of San Diego Inc., alleged that U.S. Atty. Alan Bersin, the Clinton administration’s border czar, is pursuing a tough prosecution policy on illegal immigration to score political points for the White House.

“He’s created a crisis by his policy, which has led to overcrowding at [the federal jail],” said Conte, whose group of attorneys represents indigent defendants in U.S. District Court.

Advertisement

Bersin denied that the immigration prosecutions are politically motivated, noting that most of the defendants have previous convictions for serious crimes. “By targeting people with substantial criminal histories, we have not only helped reduce crime . . . but have stopped targeting economic migrants who were previously filling the jail,” he said.

The jail has an approved capacity of 950 but until recently housed an average of 1,200 inmates each month. To ease overcrowding, officials sent 174 inmates facing immigration charges to Miramar Naval Air Station, where they rioted and burned part of the brig in March.

In examining federal court records for 30 of the biggest seizure cases at San Ysidro, The Times found that felony charges are often plea-bargained to misdemeanors, and those convicted seldom do more than six months in jail. Many other cases are settled, with federal attorneys agreeing not to prosecute if the suspect does not commit additional offenses for a year.

In one case, a 24-year-old U.S. citizen was arrested on March 15 for smuggling 68 pounds of marijuana. He previously had been convicted of conspiracy to smuggle cocaine and served 18 months. And he had been arrested in 1995 at San Ysidro with a small quantity of the drug.

However, The Times could find no record that he was prosecuted in either of his two most recent cases.

Customs inspectors and federal drug agents said narcotics rings know that chances are slim that a marijuana courier will be prosecuted. So, they say, traffickers have no trouble recruiting people and paying them $200 to drive small loads of marijuana through the port, time and again.

Advertisement

“There is virtually no risk [to smugglers] as long as they keep quantities down. First of all, the chances of getting caught are slim, and the chances of prosecution are almost zero if you get caught with a small quantity and if you’re a Mexican national,” said a veteran Drug Enforcement Administration agent who requested anonymity.

Even when smuggled in small amounts, marijuana generates huge profits for dealers, said the agent. A Jamaican drug ring recently was buying Mexican marijuana in San Diego at $500 per pound--purchasing 20 pounds to 50 pounds at a time--and selling it in Rhode Island for $1,500 a pound, the agent added.

Cases are turned over to the district attorney here for prosecution when the suspect or vehicle owner lives in San Diego County, or the drugs are destined for the county. Officials said that in the last two years, 1,462 cases were referred to local prosecutors, compared to 1,030 handled by the federal government.

Deputy Dist. Atty. Joan Stein said that in almost every case the defendant pleads guilty to a single felony count. Usually, she said, defendants are first-time offenders and are given light sentences by judges.

“Most of them have no criminal record and go to County Jail for a year or less,” Stein said. “Some are locked up for only a couple of months.”

Advertisement