Fidel Castro
The study that expresses sorrow for the hardships imposed on Cuba by the U.S. embargo (“Embargo of Cuba Exacts a ‘Tragic Human Toll,’ Health Report Charges,” March 3) and many other similar studies, comments and articles ignore the one obvious, fair and efficient way to end the embargo: restoration of democracy.
If Fidel Castro were that concerned about his people’s welfare, he would have long ago allowed free and democratic elections, let the people make the decision, and then either have been reelected or else left and lived comfortably in exile. Alas, this isn’t a dictator’s way, nor is it apparently the solution that is advocated by his many admirers, who find it easier to criticize the U.S. for stressing human rights than to condemn Castro.
SI FRUMKIN
Studio City
Your article brings to the forefront how the U.S. uses “human rights” for political purposes. In Somalia we sent troops to “feed” the people. As to Cuba, we pass laws to suppress Cubans’ so-called human rights even in the face of the United Nations voting almost unanimously against our stand.
We maintain that Cuba is a threat to our security and suppresses the human rights of its citizens. Is that why they have half the infant mortality rate of Washington, D.C.? Is that why they have an almost 100% literacy rate? It is time we promoted true human rights. Let’s lift the embargo!
MILTON L. TAUBKIN
Los Angeles
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
