Advertisement

‘Greening’ of the Back-to-Nature Movement Walls Off Shangri-La

Share
ASSOCIATED PRESS

Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell. Gerald Ford. Oprah Winfrey. Tom Cruise. Harrison Ford. Julia Roberts. Michael Milken.

They are just some of the rich and famous who live the high life in such rarefied resort areas as Aspen, Vail, Jackson, Lake Tahoe, Taos and Sun Valley.

Jim Brooksher, Kaye Ferry, Joe Montoya, Dave Richardson, Brad Jones and Mary Jane Dewhurst. Although not famous, they are vital to resort communities from the snowy slopes of the Rocky Mountains to the balmy beaches of Hawaii.

Advertisement

They operate ski lifts, drive city or school buses. They manage stores, work in restaurants, teach school, practice law, build houses. They make the resorts run.

But many can’t afford to live where they work. Or they keep two or three jobs to pay the rent. Or they cram into condos and trailers with roommates.

Some are longtime residents forced out by soaring property taxes and rents. Others are seasonal workers who remained past the ski season.

They all live in or near areas straight out of fantasies, but struggle with the realities of long commutes over icy mountain passes or spend more than half their monthly paycheck on rent.

For these people, Shangri-La has become The Forbidden City.

“People who work here should be able to live here. They shouldn’t feel excluded,” said Gary Lindstrom, a commissioner in Colorado’s Summit County.

The county is home to the Keystone, Copper Mountain and Breckenridge ski areas west of Denver. When Lindstrom moved to the area in 1974, houses were selling in the $20,000 range. Now they go for $250,000 and up.

Advertisement

In resort towns across the West, the rich are getting richer and the poor live somewhere else.

“Now it seems like everyone’s a millionaire--and the billionaires are buying them out,” said Mary Jane “Bill” Dewhurst, who has spent most of her life along the shore of Lake Tahoe at Incline Village, Nev.

For decades, growth and prosperity were goals for these resort communities, not problems. Now, while builders busily fill Montana meadows and the red-rock canyons of Sedona, Ariz., with more luxury condos, some worry about the “Aspenization” of their towns.

Prosperity has had a price. Resort towns are among the fastest-growing areas in the fastest-growing region of the country, and the growing pains felt throughout the West are magnified here. There are water worries. Crowded roads. Strained infrastructure. Higher housing costs. Friction between newcomers and old-timers.

*

It’s the dark side of the worker’s paradise: Jobs are plentiful, but affordable housing is scarce.

“In the paper, there are four pages of want ads for jobs and maybe half a page of want ads for homes,” said Dave Tolen, Aspen’s housing director--who lives in public housing.

Advertisement

Vail runs radio ads in Idaho and holds job fairs out of state seeking ski bums. Some resorts offer 401 (k) plans, employee housing and ski passes, in addition to higher wages and other benefits. In Sun Valley, Idaho, more than 200 jobs went unfilled last year because of a lack of housing. Ten times that number went unfilled in the Vail valley.

“Even the bank president can’t afford to buy a home in Aspen,” said Tom Hart, head of Colorado’s state Division of Housing.

Anne Newton, a pharmacist at the only drugstore in Big Sky, Mont., couldn’t afford housing there on her salary of $30 an hour plus benefits.

“At the age of 41, I’m going to stay with my mother and father for a while,” Newton said as she packed her belongings. Her parents live in Butte, an old mining town 120 miles west of Big Sky.

In Colorado, county governments have stepped in to build public housing, lease apartments for workers, and subsidize rents and home loans. The state works with local governments to line up financing. The Denver Catholic Archdiocese built subsidized housing complexes in three mountain towns. Vail Associates Inc., owner of the Vail and Beaver Creek ski areas, provides several hundred units of subsidized housing. But even that falls short; in the winter, Vail’s payroll swells to 4,500 from about 1,200 in the off season.

In areas where million-dollar houses are practically fixer-uppers and rents start at $1,000, the cost of living is beyond the means of many. Vail released a report this fall showing that a person had to work nearly three jobs at the average annual wage of $22,263 each to buy a condominium in town in 1995.

Advertisement

*

It’s not just restaurant workers and laborers being priced out. Businesses lose middle managers. Schoolteachers and attorneys can’t buy their own homes. And city and county governments lose good recruits when applicants check out the home prices.

“One of the sayings here is everybody in Aspen has either three jobs or three homes,” Tolen said.

Even some of the millionaires are selling their Aspen homes. They’re moving down the Roaring Fork River Valley to Basalt, Carbondale and Glenwood Springs, former havens of the working class.

Dave Richardson, a snowplow driver and heavy-equipment operator in Vail for 15 years, now lives in Bond, about 30 miles northwest of Vail. He figures the daily commute beats sleeping in the city’s public-works shop, as he did last winter.

Richardson, 36, refused to pay $400 or more a month to live with roommates in Vail.

“I’ve seen some places where five or six people are living together. That gets old,” he said.

*

Joe Montoya, who works in an Aspen restaurant, shared one of three bedrooms in a mobile home with his wife and daughter for six months.

Advertisement

“There was another family in another bedroom,” Montoya said. “You had to make meals quickly in the kitchen because so many people were there.”

Montoya felt fortunate to find church-subsidized housing in Carbondale, 26 miles northwest of Aspen. Rents there range from about $350 to nearly $500 for a three-bedroom apartment.

The real estate boom transforming resort communities throughout the West exploded more than two decades ago in Aspen. Its outdoor recreation, music and scientific seminars are a worldwide, year-round draw.

The average single-family home in Aspen sells for $1.8 million. Homes listed for $5 million, $10 million and $17 million are becoming commonplace.

Seventy percent of the homes in Vail and Aspen are second homes, whose owners spend most of the year elsewhere.

*

When people elsewhere talk disparagingly about the Aspenization of their towns, Bill Stirling considers it a compliment. Stirling, Aspen’s mayor from 1983 to 1991, said it responded promptly when prices began forcing out working people and professionals.

Advertisement

“What we all feared was loss of community,” Stirling said. “That’s something that’s irreplaceable.”

Aspen acquired land and built 1,600 subsidized units to rent and sell to people of varying income levels. The deeds restrict the increase in the sales price and limit owners to full-time county residents. The town also requires 70% of a private housing development to be moderate-income housing.

“Unfortunately, that hasn’t solved the problem,” Tolen said.

*

Vail recently completed a 71-unit project, including townhomes that sold at below-market prices. Work is underway on housing for seasonal public-works employees.

The projects are years overdue, said Kaye Ferry, owner of Daily Grind Coffee Co. in Vail.

“It’s a crisis up here,” Ferry said. More than half her employees work three jobs just to cover expenses.

“When the main focus is trying to survive,” she said, “the last thing on their mind is being able to smile at a stranger from out of town.”

*

* FORBIDDEN CITIES

‘Income City’ takes possession of Lake Tahoe community, charm. B1

Advertisement