Viagra

* Your April 27 editorial on insurance coverage for Viagra failed to assess the drug’s medical significance. For prostate cancer survivors, erectile dysfunction is a consequence of a life-threatening illness that called for extensive medical remedies. Like any healing medication, Viagra is simply a continuation of that treatment. It can restore a normal, healthy condition.

I agree that frivolous demands should not be covered. But insurers cannot claim that helping a cancer patient regain a normal sex life is not a legitimate health concern. Most of them already cover the intra-urethral alprostadil at $165 for six applications. What is their rationale for refusing to pay for Viagra at one-third the cost?

F.G. WOOD

Bakersfield