Burbank Airport Dispute

The issues surrounding the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport dispute are difficult local concerns, with national implications.

An editorial on the Federal Aviation Administration’s role in discussions on those issues was insightful (“FAA Chief’s Input Needed,” Nov. 7). The editorial suggests it is time for FAA to provide more guidance to the parties on elements of the framework for settlement agreement. I agree.

The real challenge is to provide that delicate balance between local needs and national interests. The key to any resolution is ensuring that all relevant parties are at the table and that each has a stake in a positive outcome. These parties are the cities, the airport authority, area residents, the airlines and the FAA. Unfortunately, not all the players were involved when the framework for settlement was produced.

FAA has discussed the framework with the city and the airport authority because we believe several elements of the agreement violate federal law. We continue to advise them as to how the agreement--or any subsequent redevelopment plan--can conform to applicable federal law.

Resolution of these issues must be reached locally and must comply with federal law. The FAA will continue to strongly encourage all the interested parties to involve themselves in the process. Everyone with a significant interest in the outcome must be at the table. Issues that affect parties who were not included in the discussion--such as the proposed ban on eastbound takeoffs--should be removed voluntarily from the framework. Until this happens, the agreement between the city of Burbank and the airport authority remains a first, although essential step in achieving the delicate balance that will provide the most modern, safe terminal for the airport and address the concerns of the local communities.

JANE F. GARVEY

Administrator

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration