Advertisement

Mexican Town’s Fishing Oasis Parched by Politics

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

It was a surreal creation. For three generations, a fisherman’s oasis thrived in the Chihuahuan desert here, preserved only by some switches in a control room atop a 290-foot-tall dam.

The dam went up in 1930 to pool the Rio Salado’s water for new cotton fields and two nearby towns. But the reservoir also filled up with trout, bream, bass, catfish and carp, giving rise to a village of 80 fishing families, a marina and six restaurants for visiting anglers.

Then, last year, the dam’s federal custodian flipped the switches, sending billions of gallons of water rushing toward the Rio Grande to ease a deficit in Mexico’s booming border cities and South Texas’ parched farms. Infuriated, the villagers rallied behind Adrian Guajardo and seized the control room. They stemmed the flow for 72 days but ultimately lost the battle.

Advertisement

Today, the village’s concrete boat ramp ends abruptly on a rocky, cactus-studded plain several hundred yards short of the receding waterline. Four-fifths of a man-made lake that once covered 27 square miles is gone, along with a livelihood the fishermen took for granted.

As the Rio Grande basin endures its worst drought in nearly half a century, perhaps no community has fought so hard for its water or lost so much so suddenly as Don Martin. Its decline is a lesson about the limits to survival in the world’s arid regions, where rising populations fight over a shrinking source of life.

The village’s struggle is also a sign of rising local militancy over water in northern Mexico.

Mexico’s government, committed under President Vicente Fox to democracy and openness, is facing challenges to its centuries-old habit of making water policy by decree. Protests over water transfers have erupted in other Mexican cities and rural communities during the last year, drawing Congress and the courts into disputes.

The protests have complicated relations with the United States by making it harder for Mexico to comply with a 1944 treaty obligation to share the flows of its Rio Grande tributaries with its northern neighbor. Mexico is 450 billion gallons behind on deliveries.

Don Martin--68 miles west of Laredo, Texas, in Mexico’s Coahuila state--is devoutly Roman Catholic. Many here viewed the reservoir as a gift from God and trusted the natural cycle of evaporation and rain to keep it productive.

Advertisement

“We survived before, when it was God who took our water.... He always evened things up by sending us rain,” said Guajardo, 30, a fisherman’s son who owns a restaurant here. “This time the water was taken by the will of man, and now people fear that God is angry and will not hear our prayers.”

In recent conversations at their fishing co-op, other villagers said their lost battle has driven home a painful truth: The water was never really theirs. In fact, water in Mexico is controlled by the federal government. With no plan for managing the country’s many reservoirs, it moves water around haphazardly, depending on need and political influence.

While Texas farmers collect U.S. crop insurance to offset losses, drought-stricken Mexicans collect promises from their government--but little relief. As their settlements dry up, they leave like nomads in search of water.

“Our village is disappearing little by little,” said Pedro Tijerina, a 50-year-old fisherman, speaking over the sound of wind chimes on his back patio. He estimates that 35 young men, one-tenth of Don Martin’s population, have migrated to border cities or the United States since their deep blue-green water flowed away.

“Tell President Bush that if he takes any more of our water, we’ll see him next year in Texas,” added Tijerina’s wife, Maria Jesus Ledezma.

Each evening, Don Martin’s remaining fishermen leave modest concrete-block homes and walk over what used to be the rocky lakebed to little boats moored in the shallow, silt-laden water. They row or push out on foot for more than a mile before the reservoir gets deep enough to lay their nets. Even then it is rarely 10 feet to the bottom.

Advertisement

They venture out again in the morning to haul the nets in. Few bother to start their engines, figuring that the meager catches awaiting them won’t bring enough money to pay for the fuel.

On a typical day recently, Tijerina brought home two carp, 2 pounds each. His wife filleted and froze them. It used to take the couple a week to fill their big freezer with fish that fetched about $200 from visiting wholesale buyers. Now it takes more than a month.

Some villagers can no longer afford to keep their freezers plugged in. They eat their catch instead of selling it.

Community life is under strain. Six of the 30 players on Don Martin’s youth baseball team, the Colts, have quit because their tennis shoes wore out and their parents couldn’t buy new ones.

The restaurants have lost their best clients, the sports fishermen who once drove here from Monterrey, Saltillo and Nuevo Laredo.

Such hardship has been common for years across the Rio Grande basin. Rainfall has dwindled by half over the last decade while the population has soared beyond 20 million. Cattle have died and crops have withered across northern Mexico and southern Texas. Border cities, swollen by freer U.S.-Mexico trade and the lure of new assembly plants on the Mexican side, are short of drinking water.

Advertisement

In that environment, the little village’s big reservoir--its pelicans and ducks, its fishing and tourist income--was too good to last.

Mexican authorities announced in December 2000 that they would open the dam’s four floodgates to replenish drinking water reserves for more than a million people of the lower Rio Grande.

At first, Don Martin’s inhabitants were willing to let the water go if they could save their fish. They blocked the catwalk to the dam’s control room for 20 days until federal authorities agreed to place a net across the gates.

But on Jan. 4, the gates opened without a net, and the dispute got ugly. Nearly everyone in the village, joined by their congressman, stormed the dam. They pushed aside Juan Lopez, the custodian, evaded his three growling dogs, and sawed off the control room’s lock. Lopez cut off power to the switches, but the villagers worked all night to close the gates manually, using four large wheels that lowered them by one centimeter for each 120 laborious turns.

Ledezma, a 44-year-old mother of five who had never committed a crime in her life, said she was trembling. “We were breaking federal law, intruding on federal property,” she said. “But we told ourselves that if Mexico is supposed to be a democracy they can’t stop us from defending our livelihood.”

The authorities pleaded with them at first, then got tough. In February 2001, Fox met Bush for the first time and agreed, without public discussion, to send much of Don Martin’s water north--not only to Mexican border cities, but also to Texas in partial payment of Mexico’s water debt.

Advertisement

The dam was to be opened long enough to release 57 billion gallons.

“When I went to the village and told them that, they wanted to feed me to the fish,” said Salomon Abedrop, director of the state water commission.

The 72-day seizure of the dam ended in March with a negotiated pact in Mexico City, achieved with a mixture of federal promises of aid and threats of arrests.

Little of the aid has materialized, and almost no rain has fallen to replenish the reservoir. A net went up, but its mesh was too wide to keep smaller fish from flowing through the open dam. Fish eggs were left on shore as the water receded. The government offered, then failed to restock fish in what remained of the reservoir after the dam closed in May.

Don Martin got a water purification plant, but promised loans for new boats and business ventures have yet to materialize. Ledezma and 14 other women are still waiting for machines and cloth to help them launch a sewing co-op.

Still, the village uprising helped change Mexico’s political climate. Water has become a more politically charged issue over the last year, turning the Coahuila state government into a self-professed champion of local drought victims against the whims of federal power.

Enrique Martinez, the governor, first sided with Fox in the dispute here; his emissaries helped persuade Don Martin’s residents to end their seizure of the dam.

Advertisement

In recent interviews, however, Martinez and his aides said that what happened to the fishing village was a disgrace. They are demanding that Fox explain his government’s water accords with Washington and complete millions of dollars in water conservation works before letting any more of the resource leave the state.

“Water is a federal matter,” the governor said. “But if you don’t take into account the views of the states and the citizens of the states, then you’re going to meet resistance.... How are you going to transfer water if hundreds of people are standing in front of a dam? The people won’t allow it, and their governor will support them.”

Advertisement