Seniors See a Doctor Shortage
BOULDER, Colo. — With its excellent public services, rich cultural offerings and fall afternoons that glisten like gold in a prospector’s pan, it is no wonder that this outdoor-recreation mecca has also become a retirement paradise.
But for transplanted and local retirees alike, getting to see a doctor can be even harder than registering for one of Boulder’s overbooked computer classes for seniors. Medicare cards, long considered a guarantee of health care in old age, are proving little better than fool’s gold.
Because the Medicare program has reduced the amount it reimburses doctors, many seniors now have to make as many as a dozen phone calls just to find a physician who is still accepting new Medicare patients. Others were dropped by their longtime doctors when they turned 65. “Seniors are going without care, and patients are getting sicker,” said Jim Peters, vice president of Boulder Community Hospital. “We are close to a crisis.”
Colorado is merely one of the more dramatic examples of a trend that is sweeping the country and threatening to undermine Medicare. Many Medicare cardholders have supplemental insurance for prescription drugs and other uncovered expenses, but since its enactment in 1965, Medicare has provided basic health benefits for all senior and disabled Americans.
Until now, at least. The aging of the population -- combined with escalating health-care costs, cuts in Medicare reimbursements, problems with Medicare HMOs and political gridlock in Washington -- is producing a physician shortage so severe that social service agencies in some communities now count Medicare beneficiaries with the homeless and the uninsured as being “medically underserved.”
The nonpartisan Center for Studying Health System Change recently found that about 1 in 9 Medicare beneficiaries reported delaying care or being unable to find a physician last year -- before this year’s 5.4% cut in physicians’ fees took effect.
And with the announcement expected soon of a 4.4% cut for next year in Medicare payments to doctors, the situation is likely to get even worse.
“If Congress does not reverse the cut, you will see a perfect storm,” said Dr. Jeremy A. Lazarus, a psychiatrist and president of the Colorado Medical Society. “Physicians will stop seeing even current Medicare patients.”
A bill to restore billions of dollars in reimbursements to doctors is pending in Congress, but action this year appears unlikely.
Lawmakers focused their election-year attention on demands by the 35-million-member AARP and other senior groups that Medicare begin covering prescription drugs. But the Senate could not agree on the details of a drug benefit, and when lawmakers in mid-October appeared on the verge of reversing some of the fee cuts for doctors, Sen. Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine) prevented her colleagues from doing one without the other.
The action left many Colorado physicians shaking their heads.
“We’re not talking about big money compared to a prescription drug plan,” Denver geriatrician Christopher Unrein said of Medicare reimbursements. “If you don’t have someone to write the prescription, what good does a benefit do you?”
But on Denver’s north side, where a handful of Democratic candidates appeared last month at a forum organized by AARP members, prescription drugs topped the agenda.
“I was more than disgusted” when Congress failed to pass a Medicare drug benefit, said Elsie Johnson of Lakewood. The 69-year-old joined a Medicare HMO that helped her pay for her many medications for diabetes, osteoporosis, high blood pressure and a thyroid condition. She said she would vote against GOP Sen. Wayne Allard on Tuesday despite being “a Republican from way back.”
For most of the 75 seniors at the forum, concerns about access to doctors were lost in rhetoric about Social Security privatization and drug companies’ political influence.
Yet seniors’ representatives and patient advocates know the problem is real. They believe that as more Medicare beneficiaries are turned away by doctors’ offices, they will begin to make a connection between their inability to find a physician in Colorado and their representatives in Washington.
Some already have.
Vi Bowers, slight but sharp in her blue AARP vest, recently had a hard time finding a gynecologist and an ophthalmologist in the Denver suburb of Wheat Ridge. Three or four OB/GYN offices told her they were not accepting new Medicare patients. Finally, she persuaded a friend’s doctor to take her.
But now the 75-year-old is afraid her new doctors will drop her.
“You’ve got to be careful not to step on your doctor’s toes,” Bowers said. “They don’t want to mess” with Medicare because of the low payments.
The Denver offices of Colorado Patient Advocates, the Boulder County Medicare ombudsman’s help line and the private Colorado Gerontological Society are all fielding more calls from Medicare beneficiaries unable to find doctors or pay for their prescriptions
Eileen Doherty, executive director of the gerontological society, recently asked about 100 seniors attending a Medicare meeting in suburban Littleton how many had a regular doctor.
“Only one person raised their hand,” she said. “When I asked how many have had trouble finding a doctor, about half the hands went up, and when I asked how many had to travel farther to get medical care, almost all the hands went up.”
Some advocates say the problem seems to have stabilized after their groups surveyed doctors’ offices and distributed lists of physicians still accepting Medicare patients.
Sometimes, however, knowing how to navigate the system doesn’t help.
Dorothy Rupert represented Boulder in the state Legislature for 14 years, working most of that time to make health care more available to Colorado’s poor. She knew the state’s health-care system inside out and grew concerned when new residents of The Academy retirement community told her how hard it was to find a doctor.
But it wasn’t until last year, on her last day as the term-limited Democratic leader of the state Senate, that she experienced firsthand the worsening Medicare doctor shortage.
Her husband, then 79, suffered a severe stroke and, after the frantic 911 call, the emergency room and the intensive care unit, she began trying to reach his physician of more than 20 years.
After days of repeated calls, the doctor’s office manager “finally called to say he wasn’t Dick’s doctor anymore,” recalled Rupert, still an activist at 76. “It was so hard to understand.”
After a months-long search -- aided by a private attorney -- for a Medicare-accepting physician and a nursing home she could afford, Rupert finally moved her husband to a facility near their son in Louisiana, where health care costs less and more doctors accept Medicare.
“It wasn’t that people [in Colorado] weren’t trying to help,” Rupert said, “but if the access isn’t there, it doesn’t matter.”
Access often isn’t there. According to recent surveys, only 4 primary-care physicians in 10 accept new Medicare patients in Colorado. In Colorado Springs -- where a former judge, military retirees and leaders of prominent Christian ministries are among those unable to find doctors -- the rate is closer to 1 in 10.
Increasing numbers of retirees are simply doing without a physician until they get sick. Hospital emergency departments are serving as de facto examination rooms for seniors, and many of the patients who arrive at the Penrose-St. Francis Senior Health Center have gone without health care for a while.
“Some patients have serious problems by the time we see them,” said Dr. Raymond Wahl, who came out of retirement to serve as the part-time medical director of the Medicare-only clinic. “We get a lot of referrals from doctors” no longer taking Medicare patients, he said. “It’s a desperate situation.”
Opened in November 2000 as a mission of the nonprofit Penrose Hospital and the private Penrose-St. Francis Foundation, the clinic now has about 1,300 patients. They are seen by one of three full-time nurse practitioners, who come cheaper than doctors. Wahl and another physician work part time to handle consultations and various administrative tasks.
Although the patients, by all accounts, love the clinic, it is unclear how long it will continue to operate.
About 90 miles away, the not-for-profit Boulder Community Hospital has adopted a three-pronged approach to the Medicare physician shortage. The hospital requires all of its 30 staff physicians to continue accepting Medicare patients. It works with local physician groups to recruit Medicare doctors to Boulder by subsidizing their relocation costs and salaries. And finally, the hospital and the Boulder Medical Center, a large physician group, opened a Medicare-only clinic on Sept. 1.
Peters and his colleagues now believe it’s Congress’ turn to act.
“I don’t know if [Congress] can afford not to” increase Medicare payments to doctors, he said. “In the long run, a fee increase will cost less” than having Medicare patients resort to emergency rooms for their health care.
For many physicians, the math is fairly simple. In Colorado, private insurers reimburse doctors at rates often 25% above what Medicare pays for the same services. Faced with that, individual physicians and group practices have made a business decision that no more than some fixed percentage of their patients can be on Medicare. Many are at their own ceiling, unwilling to take any more Medicare patients.
Of course, money is not the only reason doctors are dropping Medicare patients, physicians say. Paperwork hassles, complex billing codes and a “paranoia” about being accused of “fraud and abuse” also play roles.
In the end, however, “it’s really the cost of medical care that creates the [access] problem,” said Dr. David Downs, president of the Denver Medical Society. “We love our Medicare patients, but there comes a point financially where you can’t afford to see them any more,” said Dr. Ripley R. Hollister, president of the El Paso County Medical Society in Colorado Springs.
In Washington, where the government has returned to deficit spending and lawmakers weigh billions of dollars in competing demands and services, the outlook remains murky for Medicare physicians and patients.
Ten-year cost estimates for a Medicare prescription drug benefit range from $350 billion to $800 billion. The House has passed and the Senate is considering a bill to restore about $11 billion in cuts from doctors’ Medicare reimbursements over 10 years, as well as to provide additional Medicare payments for hospitals, nursing homes and HMOs.
The Bush administration has said the prescription drug plans and the proposed Medicare fee increases would cost too much.
“Obviously,” Lazarus conceded, “it’s a matter of money. But the government has made a commitment to take care of the elderly, so they need to do it.” If lawmakers learn of the serious access problems resulting from Medicare fee cuts and still fail to do anything about it, he said, “they’ve broken their covenant.”
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.