Death-with-dignity bill supported

Re “Mahony targets measure to legalize assisted suicide,” April 3

As a Buddhist, I agree with Cardinal Roger M. Mahony’s position to the extent that suicide is not the best path to take, spiritually speaking. However, I cannot agree with his position denouncing AB 374, a state bill that would legalize assisted suicide. If someone else thinks he needs to prematurely end his suffering, that should be a personal choice.

I think the right compromise can be found in a twofold approach. First, make pain-relieving medication and procedures affordable or free so people are not lured into taking their own lives to save their families money, as I’ve heard expressed. Second, educate people about the negative aspects of taking one’s own life. The latter is a job for spiritual leaders. Let’s make sure we do not bow to one religion’s tenets, thereby restricting the options of those who may not share the particular belief.

GARY D. DAVIS

Los Angeles

*

While Mahony denounces yet another attempt to free ourselves from the constraints of religious superstition -- the right to chose a dignified death in the face of unacceptably diminished quality of life -- he might want to reflect on the enormity of his hypocrisy. This is a man who to this day refuses to reveal the truth about what he knew about pedophilia in the Catholic clergy. Perhaps on the day he comes forward with all the knowledge sought by those sexually assaulted by priests, we might be willing to hear his disingenuous dogma about this perceived assault on life.

SHAUN MASON

Los Angeles

*

I pray that our Legislature passes this bill. Such a law has worked well in Oregon for nine years, with only about 200 people taking advantage of it. Many others have signed up but have not taken advantage of the law. They welcome the peace of mind knowing they have the choice not to suffer a painful death.

Why is the right to help suffering animals to a peaceful death denied to humans? I am 88, active and in good health, but I need to know that when the time comes, I won’t have to suffer a lingering, painful death. I am prepared with methods to end my life with dignity, and I would like every person to have the same right.

JEAN DESMOND

Rancho Palos Verdes

*

Re “A little dignity,” editorial, April 5

I thank The Times for the fine job it did explaining how the bill would work. I have only one minor objection and that’s in your use of the word “suicide.” I’m not a linguist, but I suggest “aid in dying” better describes the bill’s intent. The terminally ill people who would ultimately gain some peace of mind as they face their deaths are no more committing suicide than did the victims of 9/11 who jumped from the burning buildings. Those victims faced horrific deaths. The dying victims who would take advantage of AB 374, assuming it’s passed, face deaths even more dreadful because they will likely endure prolonged suffering while their families watch. If they choose to hasten this torturous process, can we legitimately say they are committing suicide?

LINDA BANEZ

La Mirada