Fighting over war
- Share via
Re “A Pentagon battle over ‘the next war,’ ” July 21
After the Holocaust, we said “never again,” and then came Rwanda; after Vietnam, we said “never again,” and then came Iraq. History is its own best prediction. In the Nuclear Age, no able enemy dares challenge the U.S. in what Air Force Major Gen. Charles J. Dunlap Jr. terms a “symmetrical” war. History has shown that the result of symmetry is a cold war that ultimately is fought by proxy in irregular guerrilla conflicts.
The wars that generals get are not the wars they want. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates was right to rid the Pentagon of wish-thinking hawks like Michael Wynne. When planning for challenges from hostile powers with conventional armies, Congress would be better served by heeding Gates’ admonitions to invest heavily in our country’s diplomatic abilities.
Kevin T. Freeman
Rancho Cucamonga
The Times mentions Iraq nine times and Afghanistan five times, but China or Russia? Zero.
How can you not mention these countries? You could have minimally written that neither is a threat, but that wouldn’t have sounded right. The reasonable conclusion is that we need to prepare for both kinds of war, symmetric and asymmetric.
Frank Natoli
Newton, N.J.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.