Keeping it off

Times Staff Writer

In HER 39 years, Claudia Hallblom has, by her own estimation, lost and regained about 1,000 pounds.

Her success at losing weight was always driven by a goal, such as looking nice for her graduation or wedding. Her tactics usually included strict calorie-counting. But success on the scales was always fleeting. Sooner or later, she would revert to her old habits and no longer feel motivated to change.

“I didn’t know how to lose weight and keep it off,” the Downey woman says.

Most people can lose weight. But few can maintain their new weight for long. Researchers are now tackling that problem, and what they’re learning is disconcerting. The human body, it seems, is designed to sabotage weight loss at every turn -- once a body has been fatter, it wants to get back to the weight that it used to be. Physiology is cruelly changed in two ways: The body needs fewer calories to maintain itself, but its craving for food is more intense.


Becoming overweight, in other words, is like being issued a credit card with an uncomfortably high balance that you’ll probably end up paying off forever. Making sure the pounds stay off means pitting one’s willpower against a swarm of biological processes involving the brain, hormones, metabolism and fat storage.

“There is a big shift toward understanding long-term weight maintenance,” says Paul MacLean, associate professor of medicine at the University of Colorado, Denver. “We have a huge number of diet books and diet programs, and if you do them, you can lose weight. The big problem is keeping it off. The recent estimates are that 5% to 10% of people are successful at keeping weight off on a long-term basis.”

But before you throw up your hands and reach for the Twinkies, consider this: Scientists think the truth will set us free -- that understanding the stubborn biological processes at work will lead to ways to fight back and outsmart them.

Exercise, it’s known, buffers the post-diet body against regaining weight, in ways that researchers are just starting to comprehend. Certain foods, scientists believe, may help stave off weight regain too. And medications now in development target some of the biochemistry thought to be linked to packing the pounds back on.

“There are strong physiological adaptations to weight loss that promote weight regain,” MacLean says. “The good news is we know a big part of the problem and why we haven’t been successful over the past several decades.”

The energy gap

Human biology -- for obvious adaptive reasons -- is designed to protect against weight loss and potential starvation. And after a period of obesity, the body may permanently alter the way weight is regulated by more aggressively stimulating appetite and signaling the body to protect fat stores.


Metabolism has changed: the body now needs about eight fewer calories per day for each pound of weight that was lost. That means someone who loses 40 pounds will require about 320 calories fewer each day than they did before the weight loss. This difference in energy needs before and after weight loss has been dubbed the “energy gap” by University of Colorado professor James O. Hill, director of the Center for Human Nutrition in Denver.

Appetite hormones change too. The hormone leptin, for example, is a major appetite regulator -- it tells the body to stop eating and store fat after meals. Some people may be genetically prone to having lower leptin levels, making them more prone to obesity. But studies also show that, after a weight loss, leptin levels are lower than what they used to be. That means appetite is less easily quelled. It’s like a car that has suddenly lost its brakes.

Another hormone, ghrelin, stimulates food intake -- levels in the brain fall lower after a meal. However, after a weight loss, ghrelin levels in the blood generally increase, and the fall-off after mealtimes isn’t as marked.

“You lose 10% of your body weight. All of a sudden all these systems kick in to try to keep you from losing weight,” says Dr. Ken Fujioka, director of nutrition and metabolic research at the Scripps Clinic in San Diego. “People are mad at themselves or depressed after they regain the weight. But I explain: It’s not you. Biology has kicked in now. . . . You are hungry all the time. You think about food all the time.”

The brain isn’t the only thing acting to promote weight regain. MacLean’s research suggests that the central nervous system collects and interprets signals from the intestines and peripheral tissues, such as fat stores in the abdomen, to fight weight loss or regain pounds that were lost.

Through this sensing, when calories consumed surpass calories expended, the body alters how it uses and stores fuel. Glucose becomes the preferred fuel for energy, and fat is directed to fatty tissue stores in the body. Excess glucose is also converted to fat. And studies performed at the University of Toronto using continuous glucose monitoring devices show the blood sugar levels of obese people spike and plummet routinely throughout the day while normal-weight people have more stable levels.


Each drop is a cue to eat, says Dr. Michael R. Lyon, medical and research director for the Canadian Center for Functional Medicine.

The weight comes back fast. “The entire system is saying, ‘Bring the calories in, store them efficiently and do not reduce these signals until the fat is returned that was there before,’ ” MacLean says. “You may look like a lean person, but your body hasn’t changed inside.”

Moreover, animal studies show that most of the regained weight is distributed as visceral fat, the abdominal paunch that is linked to heart disease and diabetes.

Tough, but losable

So what is a dieter to do?

“There is nothing we know of that does anything to reverse this,” Fujioka says of the biological forces that defend body fat. “It’s very tough.”

But it’s not impossible. The National Weight Control Registry is an honor roll of dieters who have fought and won. Started in 1994 with modest expectations by Hill and Rena Wing, director of the weight control and diabetes research center at Brown Medical School, the registry now provides some cherished data on how regular people have managed to keep weight off. The registrants, who are surveyed regularly, have maintained a weight loss of at least 30 pounds for at least one year.

Based on data from more than 7,000 people, Wing says there are few similarities in how people lose weight. But those who succeed in maintenance sing the same song.


Instead of trying to eat less for the rest of their lives to bridge the energy gap, these people exercise more. They typically spend an hour or more each day in aerobic exercise and strictly limit time spent watching television.

Physical activity, in ways that researchers don’t really understand, influences some of the biological systems that promote weight regain, encouraging the body to become more sensitive to leptin and insulin, for example.

“Everyone thinks exercise is about burning calories,” Fujioka says. “But you are actually returning the system to more like what it should be. Things start working again.”

The successful maintainers also change what they eat: The registry found that they keep their calories in careful balance with what they expend -- religiously referring to calorie charts and writing down everything they consume. They also tend to eat low-fat foods.

But there may be more nuances to food choices than that. “We’re getting more interested in studies that look at food composition,” Fujioka says. “It could be that eating certain nutrients may also help the system work better.”

Studies suggest that calcium, for example, may help people regulate their weight, he says. No one really understands how calcium may do this -- in fact, the theory is controversial. But it could be that a diet high in calcium suppresses a form of vitamin D called calcitriol that revs up fat-burning processes.


Other research has focused on foods that balance blood-sugar levels, such as low-glycemic and fibrous foods. Studies show that eating low-glycemic foods, such as lentils and nuts and foods with high water or fiber content, helps stabilize blood sugar and curb the brain signals that urge people to eat. Fiber does this by slowing the absorption of carbohydrates from food, which helps lower their glycemic load.

“Weight loss alone is not a realistic goal,” Lyon says. “It can do more harm than good. The key is to get your brain back on your side. The starting point of that is stabilizing blood sugar.”

It’s easier after two years

Scientists don’t know how long it would take to return the physiological responses of a once-obese body to normal -- or if, indeed, that ever is quite possible.

Studies do show, however, that weight regain is most likely in the first couple of years after weight loss. And Wing says that registry data shows that people who maintain their weight loss find the first two years difficult but eventually adapt comfortably to their new habits and lifestyles.

“After that, it’s as if you master the technique,” she says.

The current research on obesity strongly points to two messages that rely heavily on human behavior: Don’t gain excess weight in the first place, and if you do, be prepared to make permanent lifestyle changes to lose it and maintain the loss.

Hallblom finally lost 63 pounds over a period of 14 months by adhering to Weight Watchers’ principles -- such as learning the nutritional content of food and keeping track of her food intake -- and taking up vigorous exercise: running 10 to 12 miles a week and working out three times weekly on an elliptical machine.


She has maintained her healthy weight for seven years and in 2001 was hired by Weight Watchers to improve its services to Spanish-speaking clients in Southern California. She says she wishes she had realized years ago that maintaining a new weight required a very different kind of lifestyle -- forever.

“This time,” she says, “I was ready to make permanent changes to improve my life.”



More diversity needed in data

Since 1994, the National Weight Control Registry has compiled information on people who have lost weight and maintained the loss. From those records, registry directors have been able to identify factors that add up to successful weight maintenance -- such as regular exercise and eating breakfast.

But many of the data have come from white women, says co-director Rena Wing of Brown Medical School. The registry needs input from all racial and ethnic groups to see whether there are differences linked to gender, race or ethnicity. Anyone who has lost 30 pounds or more and maintained the loss for one year or longer can enroll in the registry.

The minimum age for participation has been 18. But the registry has started a teen branch, for people 14 and older, to learn more about how teens may differ from adults.

Contact the registry at or (800) 606-6927.

Shari Roan



Drug combo may keep flab off

Drug manufacturers are turning their attention to the maintenance problem. The San Diego company Amylin, for example, is testing a drug combination targeted at two of the hormonal signals driving weight regain.


In 2005, Amylin produced a drug, pramlintide, that helps lower blood sugar in diabetics who have uncontrolled blood sugar despite therapy with other drugs. It acts by mimicking a hormone that is released into the blood after feeding to help regulate glucose and slow the rate of food absorption.

In a six-month study published May 20 by Amylin Pharmaceuticals in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the combination of pramlintide with leptin reduced body weight in 177 overweight men and women by an average of 12.7%, about double the weight loss people typically experience on the medications Xenical and Meridia. Because of the systems the drug combination targets, researchers think it may be even more useful for weight maintenance.

Adding pramlintide “may sensitize the brain so it will work with leptin and do the right things,” says Dr. Ken Fujioka, director of nutrition and metabolic research at the Scripps Clinic in San Diego. Fujioka has worked on clinical trials studying pramlintide.

Drug solutions are a ways off, however, and may only lend a hand at maintaining weight. “It’s clear to us that you can’t address just a single system,” Fujioka says. “There are too many systems at work.”

Shari Roan