21 states sue to block expansion of who is eligible for overtime pay
A coalition of 21 states sued the U.S. Department of Labor on Tuesday over a new rule that would make about 4 million higher-earning workers eligible for overtime pay, slamming the measure as inappropriate federal overreach from the Obama administration.
Nevada Atty. Gen. Adam Laxalt, a Republican, filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Eastern Texas, urging the court to block implementation before the regulation takes effect Dec. 1. Laxalt, a frequent critic of President Obama’s policies, said the rule would burden the private and public sectors by straining budgets and forcing layoffs or cuts in working hours.
“This rule, pushed by distant bureaucrats in D.C., tramples on state and local government budgets, forcing states to shift money from other important programs to balance their budgets, including programs intended to protect the very families that purportedly benefit from such federal overreach,” he said in a statement.
Labor Department officials did not immediately respond to telephone and emailed requests seeking comment.
The measure would shrink the “white-collar exemption” that exempts workers who perform “executive, administrative or professional” duties from overtime and minimum wage requirements.
It would more than double the salary threshold under which employers must pay overtime to their white-collar workers. Overtime protections would apply to workers who make up to $913 a week, or $47,476 a year, and the threshold would be adjusted every three years to reflect changes in average wages.
“This long-awaited update will result in a meaningful boost to many workers’ wallets, and will go a long way toward realizing President Obama’s commitment to ensuring every worker is compensated fairly for their hard work,” the Labor Department said in May when it announced the new rule.
Business groups say the changes are too much and too fast, especially as states continue to recover from the recent recession.
“We believe that many employers across our state and the country — large and small alike — will not be able to meet the high cost of these ongoing rate changes, and as a result, will be forced to curtail hiring or even lay off employees,” said Kristin McMillan, president of the Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce.
In addition to Nevada, the plaintiffs are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin.
The Eastern Texas district where the lawsuit was filed is known as a “rocket docket” court where cases move along quickly.
U.S. guidelines on self-driving cars offer some clues on future policy
Premium gas provides no benefit to cars made for regular, AAA study finds
Wells Fargo updates: Sen. Elizabeth Warren rips into CEO’s ‘gutless leadership’
The view from Sacramento
Sign up for the California Politics newsletter to get exclusive analysis from our reporters.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.