Judge rules Dylann Roof is competent to face death penalty trial in South Carolina shootings
Reporting from Columbia, S.C. — Dylann Roof is competent to stand trial starting next week in the killing of nine black worshippers at a South Carolina church last year, a federal judge ruled Friday.
U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel’s ruling clears the way for jury selection to restart Monday.
The judge delayed the process to begin narrowing the final jury pool on Nov. 7 when Roof’s lawyers suggested he either didn’t understand the charges against him or couldn’t properly help them with his defense.
Roof, 22, is charged in federal court with hate crime, obstruction of religion and other counts for the June 2015 attack at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston.
The decision came three days after Gergel wrapped up a hastily called two-day hearing that was held behind closed doors.
But the exact reasons and any testimony and facts backing Gergel’s findings are not known. Defense lawyers have not said what led them to question Roof’s competency, and the judge sealed his findings for the same reason he took the rare step of allowing only Roof, his lawyers, prosecutors, court officials and witnesses in the hearing. Roof made statements to a psychologist that might not be legal to use at his trial and could taint potential jurors.
Gergel had promised to release a redacted version of his order last week, but instead, he filed it under seal.
At Roof’s competency hearing, Gergel heard testimony from psychologist James Ballenger and four other unnamed witnesses and reviewed sworn statements from three others, the judge wrote in his order. Ballenger completed his psychological review of Roof in a few days.
According to police, Roof sat through nearly an hour of prayer and Bible study at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church with its pastor and 11 others before pulling a gun from his fanny pack near the end of the class and firing dozens of shots.
Roof hurled racial insults at the six women and three men he is accused of killing and the three people he left alive, authorities said. He said he left the three unharmed so they could tell the world the shootings were because he hated black people.
Roof already has been found competent in state court, where prosecutors plan a second death penalty trial on nine counts of murder.
ALSO
Dylann Roof’s manifesto resembles comments on neo-Nazi website, analysis finds
Editorial: Why even an accused racist murderer like Dylann Roof shouldn’t face the death penalty
Accused Charleston church shooter Dylann Roof wants to plead guilty, lawyer says
UPDATES:
7:30 a.m.: This story has been updated with information about the Charleston church shootings, as well as Roof’s psychological review.
7:03 a.m.: This story has been updated with additional details about the judge’s ruling, as well as the trial and jury selection.
This article was originally published at 6:50 a.m.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.