U.S. troops and armored vehicles going to Syria oil fields, U.S. Defense secretary says
The United States will send armored vehicles and combat troops into eastern Syria to keep oil fields from potentially falling into the hands of Islamic State militants, U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said Friday.
It was the latest sign that extracting the U.S. military from Syria is more uncertain and complicated than President Trump is making it out to be. Though Trump repeatedly has said he is pulling out of Syria, the reality on the ground is different.
Adding armored reinforcements in the oil-producing area of Syria could mean sending several hundred U.S. troops — even as a similar number are being withdrawn from a separate mission closer to the border with Turkey where Russian forces have been filling the vacuum.
Esper described the added force as “mechanized,” which means it probably will include armored vehicles such as Bradley armored infantry carriers and possibly tanks, although details were still being worked out. This reinforcement would introduce a new dimension to the U.S. military presence, which largely has been composed of special operations forces not equipped with tanks or other armored vehicles.
Esper spoke at a news conference at NATO headquarters in Brussels, where he consulted with fellow alliance members.
Sending an armored force to eastern Syria would partially reverse the ongoing shrinkage of the U.S. troop presence in Syria. Trump has ordered the withdrawal of nearly all 1,000 U.S. troops who had been partnering with a Syrian Kurdish-led militia against the Islamic State group. That withdrawal is proceeding even as Esper announced the plan to put reinforcements in the oil-producing area.
Speaking to reporters Friday at the White House, Trump said the U.S.-brokered agreement with Turkey to halt its offensive against formerly U.S.-supported Syrian Kurdish fighters was a win for his administration. That offensive began after Trump announced U.S. troops would not stand in the way, though he also said the U.S. would punish Turkey’s economy if the country acted inhumanely.
He also said anew on Friday that “we’re getting our troops out” of Syria, without mentioning Esper’s announcement.
“We are doing well in Syria, with Turkey and everybody else that we’re dealing with,” Trump said. “We have secured the oil. ... We have a couple of people that came knocking; we said, don’t knock. And I think I would say that things are going very well.”
White House officials would not clarify whom he was referring to as “knocking.”
The U.S. special envoy for Syria, James Jeffrey, said in Geneva on Friday he had talked to a Russian official about an unspecified issue in Syria’s oil region.
“We are currently very concerned about certain developments in the south, in the Dair Alzour area,” Jeffrey said. “I’ve talked to my Russian colleague about that and we’re having other contacts with the Russians concerning that situation. We think it is under control now.”
Although Esper did not mention the size of the U.S. reinforcements, it could total several hundred troops because fuel-guzzling tanks and other armored vehicles depend on a large supply-and-logistical-support group. One official, who discussed the planning on condition of anonymity because some details remained to be agreed upon, cautioned that tanks might eventually be eliminated from the mix because of logistical challenges, including air transport.
Russian and Turkish leaders have now divided up security roles in northeast Syria following Trump’s abrupt troop withdrawal from the Turkey-Syrian border region. The American move triggered widespread criticism that the U.S. administration had abandoned the Syrian Kurdish fighters who fought alongside the U.S. against Islamic State for several years.
Esper’s announcement came even as Trump again indicated in tweets that the U.S. military mission in Syria is complete. He previously has acknowledged a willingness to help protect the oil fields in eastern Syria, suggesting they could benefit the Kurds as well as the United States, although those resources belong to the Syrian government.
“Oil is secured,” Trump tweeted Friday. “Our soldiers have left and are leaving Syria for other places, then ... COMING HOME! ... When these pundit fools who have called the Middle East wrong for 20 years ask what we are getting out of the deal, I simply say, THE OIL, AND WE ARE BRINGING OUR SOLDIERS BACK HOME, ISIS SECURED!”
Asked about America’s shifting Syria strategy, Esper said the U.S. mission has always been to prevent the resurgence of Islamic State. “That mission remains unchanged,” he said.
But Esper said at NATO that the U.S. is “considering how we might reposition forces in the area in order to ensure we secure the oil field.” He added: “We are reinforcing that position. It will include some mechanized forces.”
He made clear the main purpose is to prevent Islamic State from regaining access to Syrian oil, which before 2017 was a major source of its revenue.
Starting in late 2015 and continuing for many months, the U.S. conducted airstrikes against a range of oil resources in the Dair Alzour area that had been taken over by Islamic State. The attacks damaged or knocked out oil tanker convoys, oil processing plants, storage facilities, pumping stations, pipelines and refineries. It was called Operation Tidal Wave II, after a World War II air campaign to hit Romania’s oil industry.
Esper said Islamic State, sometimes known by the acronym ISIS, must not be allowed to again threaten the oil.
“If ISIS has access to the resources, and therefore the means to procure arms or to buy fighters or whatever else they do, then it means it makes it more difficult to defeat ISIS,” he said.
Just last week, Trump insisted that all American forces in Syria would come home. Then he said the 1,000 in the north would return home and that American troops in the south, numbering about 200 at the Tanf garrison in the south, would stay.
Trump in the past days has turned a greater focus on the Syrian oil facilities in the eastern part of the country, saying U.S. will stay in Syria to protect them.
According to officials, top military leaders have pushed for the U.S. to leave forces in Syria to guard against an Islamic State resurgence. Though the group’s physical zone of control was largely destroyed by U.S. and Syrian Kurdish forces, insurgents remain in small pockets in Syria as well as in Iraq.
Must-read stories from the L.A. Times
Get the day's top news with our Today's Headlines newsletter, sent every weekday morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.