Government to release details on its collection of phone records

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration plans to release previously secret court orders that set out the rules and rationale for the bulk collection of U.S. phone records as officials seek to quell growing unrest in Congress over the government’s massive information dragnet.

According to a senior U.S. official, the government has declassified the order by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or FISA court, that authorized the collection program, which began in 2007. Before that, the National Security Agency had been collecting telephone records without a court order since shortly after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The now declassified order is expected to be made public Wednesday when Deputy Atty. Gen. James Cole, NSA Deputy Director John Inglis and other officials appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden disclosed the program by giving the Guardian newspaper and the Washington Post a secondary order from the foreign intelligence court directed at one company, Verizon. The primary order has more details, the official said, including the rules under which intelligence agencies are allowed to search the database of phone records for the details of specific calls.

Since Snowden’s disclosures, which were published in June, administration officials have been engaged in intense internal debates over how much information to release about the program and the secret orders of the foreign intelligence court.

National security officials have resisted many proposals to declassify information on the program, arguing that virtually any information about it could potentially be used by terrorist groups to evade U.S. surveillance. Other administration officials have argued that Congress could kill the entire program if the administration fails to reassure the public about how the information is gathered and what protections are in place for privacy.

In addition to the court order from 2007, administration officials are also planning to release two white papers on the telephone-data program that were provided to Congress in 2009 and 2011 before the House and Senate voted to reauthorize the law behind it, the senior official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to be quoted.

The white papers summarized the program, made clear that it included “bulk collection” and asked the intelligence committees to provide the papers in a classified setting to all members of Congress, the official said. The release is intended to make clear that Congress had the opportunity to be fully informed, despite protests in recent weeks from some members who said they didn’t understand the extent of the records collection.

The administration is also considering a plan to release a memorandum setting out the program’s legal rationale. Under the Patriot Act, the government may collect records that are “relevant to an investigation.” Officials have not explained in detail how a database of phone records of nearly every American meets that legal test. The issue of releasing the legal opinion is still being debated, the official said.

The NSA’s database includes so-called telephony metadata on nearly every American. The data include records of calls for each telephone number, but not names, addresses or the contents of any communication, officials have said. Intelligence agencies query the database when they identify specific phone numbers that are believed to be linked to terrorist groups. Last year, 300 phone numbers were used to query the database, officials have said.

Amid polls showing public concern about NSA surveillance, key lawmakers are looking at various proposals designed to boost confidence, including changes to the law that allows the surveillance. Some lawmakers want the phone companies, not NSA, to retain the data.

One of those lawmakers, Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, praised the decision to declassify the court order as “a positive step that will help inform the public debate.”

“The effort to provide greater transparency must not end here, and I urge the administration to declassify key decisions of the court involving issues of constitutional dimension,” he said. “I also hope the administration will support legislation to require declassification of future decisions, not just past ones — so that we can assure that a more transparent FISA court becomes standard practice for this and future administrations.”

ken.dilanian@latimes.com