In 2006, California voters approved nearly $20 billion worth of transportation bonds, of which $2 billion is dedicated to goods movement -- the infrastructure needed to move cargo to and from the ports. Snoble was part of a coalition of transportation chiefs from five Southern California counties that lobbied decision makers last fall, rightly arguing that because 85% of the goods passing through California goes through those five counties, they deserved at least 70% of the goods-movement pot.

The coalition didn't get what it wanted. Last week, the state Transportation Commission doled out $1.65 billion to the five counties -- which, because the commission ultimately approved $3 billion worth of projects (many of which won't really get funded), adds up to only 56.5% of the total. Nuñez is furious at Snoble in part because the coalition agreed to the low number during a two-day trip to Sacramento in November. Yet the local transportation chiefs are adamant that they got the best possible deal for their region, and moreover, Snoble was one of about a dozen agency heads involved. So why was he singled out for Nuñez's scorn? Meanwhile, Nuñez blames Snoble for the fact that the MTA sponsored just one of the 53 projects put forward for funding by the coalition. But the MTA is a public transit agency; there is no conceivable reason why it should have sponsored more goods-movement projects.

The attack on Snoble is so unjustified that it strongly suggests there are unspoken political motivations at work. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa may have provided a hint about those motives when he put out a release saying he took Nuñez's complaints seriously and would direct the MTA board to investigate. Villaraigosa, a friend of Nuñez's, has long had a chilly relationship with Snoble, whose contract expires in September, and may be seeking to replace him.

Snoble represents a vast improvement over past MTA directors. When it's time for the MTA board to consider extending his contract, it should judge him on his merits -- not on Nuñez's absurd character assassination.

OPINION » One world? Obama's on a different planet By John R. Bolton The senator's Berlin speech was radical and naive. EDITORIALS|OP-ED|LETTERS				FROM THE BLOGS Opinion L.A. Opinion L.A. The best in Southern California opinion journalism, Monday through Friday Why should you pay for Fannie and Freddie? Fri, July 25, 2008 | 6:14:18 PM PDT Aren't the worst-case scenarios about the death of the dollar and irreperable... more » Bit Player By Jon Healey Bit Player Jon Healey on Hollywood's love-hate relationship with technology. A Paramount movie integrated into Sony web programming Fri, July 25, 2008 | 5:32:55 PM PDT This is so meta, I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around it. Today Bebo... more »