PETA bleeds stupidity

This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.

Page Six today reports that Kim Cattrall doesn’t want blood on her hands for wearing all those furs and carrying skins (thanks to designer Nancy Gonzalez) in the new ‘Sex and the City’ movie. OK, a girl has to make a living. But wouldn’t Cattrall be more effective if she refused to wear fur or carry an exotic skin bag in her role as Samantha? Even worse, the item says that Cattrall -- who is ‘adamantly against fur’ -- will donate all the luxury merchandise back to PETA after the shoot.

What will they do with it? PETA will mark the furs and skins with a red X and give them to homeless people. Is there anything more absurd and degrading than making indigent folks wear some sort of sucky scarlet letter? Will a lizard skin blazer really keep a guy on the street warm? How stupid, hypocritical and humiliating.

Photo credits: Cattrall, Wire Image; homeless woman, Life