A seller’s lament: Not desperate, but anxious
This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.
Good morning. Why don’t sellers lower their prices? The L.A. Times takes a look at the market today, and profiles a seller who hasn’t yet come to grips with the market.
Joe Lee is still holding out for $700,000 that he’s asking for his 2,600-square-foot, three-bedroom home in Lynwood. Lee has owned the home for 25 years, listed it for sale three months ago, and has reduced the price by $25,000 -- 3.5% from where he started. DataQuick stats, though, show prices per-square-foot have dropped 17% since mid-2006 in his zip code. ‘I wouldn’t say I’m desperate, but anxious, yes, I am feeling anxious,’ he said.
Other anecdotes and insights from a well-researched ‘state of the market’ story:
-- Don’t assume recent buyers can afford to sell at their original purchase price. Some need much more than that to break even. Story notes one Valley seller who bought for $890,000 in 2004 (100% financing), and later refinanced to take out $100,000. ‘They’ve got a situation where their break-even point is $1,150,000,’ said their agent, Peter LaMonica. ‘I just don’t know if it’s realistic for them to get that.’ The house is listed for $1.249 million.
-- LaMonica’s advice: If you’re thinking about selling in the next few years, sell now, and price your house lower than comps: ‘In this market, if we accidentally price your house too low, it could be a blessing,’ he said. ‘It’s a big mistake to wait 60 or 90 days before lowering the price. You’re going to get the greatest amount of exposure at the beginning of the listing.’
-- One more from the Valley: One seller put her 3-bedroom, one-bath home in Lake Balboa (Van Nuys) on the market for $525,000 in July. She’s since cut her price to $433,000. Only two prospective buyers have visited the house since October.
Your thoughts? Comments? E-mail story tips to peter.viles@latimes.com.