Banning brothels could endanger prostitutes, Canadian court rules

This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.

A Canadian appeals court in Ontario ruled Monday that banning brothels is unconstitutional and could put prostitutes in danger by not allowing them to work in a safe location.

Such a ban would ‘prevent prostitutes from taking the basic safety precaution of moving indoors to locations under their control,’ the court wrote in its decision Monday.

The case could set a legal precedent for challenging laws against prostitution in Canada. Though sex work is legal in Canada, running a brothel or ‘bawdy house’ has been banned, along with other activities linked to prostitution.

‘The feds and the province did not have the evidence to prove that these laws are constitutional and are effective,’ dominatrix Terri-Jean Bedford, one of the parties in the legal battle, told the Toronto Star. ‘They’re totally opposite. They force women underground into dark segments of society in harm’s way.’


In its decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld part of a ruling two years ago that struck down several laws that restricted sex work. However, the court disagreed with another part of that decision, saying prostitutes should still be prohibited from soliciting clients in public places.

The court has given the government one year to rewrite the law if it chooses to, the Associated Press reported. The decision is expected to be appealed to the Canadian Supreme Court.


Afghan shooting: U.S. pays $50,000 per villager killed

Germany signals willingness to boost Europe’s bailout fund

Tibetan sets himself ablaze in India before Chinese leader visits

— Emily Alpert in Los Angeles