U.N. Debates Condemnation of South Africa

The Security Council on Thursday debated a French resolution condemning apartheid and black repression in South Africa and asking that its members take economic sanctions against the Pretoria regime.

France and its Western allies, who had hoped for a quick vote and the elimination of a lengthy debate on the issue, were thwarted by African and nonaligned states who were insisting on tougher action, including mandatory sanctions.

“The nonaligned countries are convinced that mandatory economic sanctions are necessary,” declared Indian delegate Vinay K. Verma. India heads the movement of nonaligned countries, which number more than 100.

U.S. Ambassador Vernon A. Walters spoke out against apartheid but warned that total isolation of South Africa will lead to “more bloodshed, . . . a curtailment of external influence to effect change and, in the end, to greater suffering for the very people we are all trying to help.”

Walters was expected to abstain on the French resolution condemning apartheid and the mass arrests that have taken place this week under a “state of emergency.”

South Africa’s ambassador, Kurt Von Schirnding, said the internal situation in his country is not a matter for discussion in the Security Council.

“Nothing this council may say or plan will deter us from doing what we believe is in the best interests of all the peoples of South Africa,” he said.

The French proposal, besides calling on South Africa to lift the state of emergency it proclaimed in 36 areas, urged--but would not require--member states to take five possible sanctions: suspension of new investment, prohibition of the importation of Krugerrand gold coins, suspension of guaranteed export loans, prohibition of new nuclear power contracts and a ban on sales of computer equipment for military and police use.

The council adjourned late Thursday night without a vote and will meet again today.