Advertisement

MAKING UP THE IDEAL SEQUOIA IS HARD TO DO

Share

“I’ve been looking all these years for the ideal quartet,” says violinist Peter Marsh. “And the longer I look, the more difficult the search.”

On the subject of string quartets, Marsh speaks from the experience of more than three decades. With that authority, and after 23 years as leader of the Lenox Quartet, five years as first violinist of two other ensembles and today first violin of the Los Angeles-based Sequoia Quartet, he says that quartet-playing is not for everyone, whatever his interests and qualifications.

For the time being, however, Marsh says he is happy to be a part of the Sequoia ensemble, a group of ostensible stability through most of its 14-year history, but one which has been in transition during the past two seasons.

Advertisement

Building a quartet, whether from the ground up or from the foundation of an existing ensemble, is a very complicated business, says the veteran chamber-player.

The technical demands on the individuals are enormous and not forgiving of any musician who is less than virtuosic in accomplishment, he says.

And beyond that, Marsh says: “It’s really tough finding that right combination of players who have strong qualities as musicians, yet who can get along with each other. It’s a matter, first, of personality, of being an artist with an individual sense of perspective, then of interacting with others in a productive way.

“There are so many quartets who do well, who play with admirable style and ensemble--but who really have no face.”

Beginning a new season this afternoon in Little Tokyo’s Japan America Theatre, the Sequoia Quartet, comprising Marsh, two of its original members--violinist Miwako Watanabe and violist James Dunham--and cellist Bonnie Hampton (new to the ensemble as of this summer), still seeks its face.

All four players profess hope and faith that this combination of members will be successful and lasting. Each of the four admits that there are risks involved. But optimism is the prevailing mood of the newest incarnation of Sequoia.

Advertisement

Founded at CalArts in 1972 by four young musicians with connections to the Valencia school--Watanabe, Dunham, Yoko Matsuda and Joel Krosnick--the Sequoia Quartet in the intervening years has survived success and failure.

(Within two years, Robert Martin replaced cellist Krosnick--who left to pursue free-lance work and later joined the Juilliard Quartet, of which he is still a member.)

Among its successes, have been the quartet’s Beethoven cycle, its Bartok cycle, a Naumburg Award--and subsequent East Coast debuts and engagements--an Australian tour and an expanding hometown series. The quartet’s fortunes have been guided and supported by a number of professional managements and by the Sequoia String Quartet Foundation.

The group has had only one clear-cut failure, if one discounts the ensemble’s current lack of an academic home base (the Sequoia has been a resident quartet at both CalArts and Cal State Long Beach in recent seasons).

That was the breakup of the marriage, five years ago, between first violinist Matsuda and violist Dunham. For most members of the quartet’s public, that event seemed not to take place; as far as they could see and hear, it caused no disruption in the ensemble’s schedule, no interruption in its performances, nor any apparent lowering of its musical standards.

Four years later, however, in the spring of 1985, the very survival of the quartet came into question.

Advertisement

At that time, Matsuda and Martin decided to leave, each citing a desire to pursue a number of other musical options.

Eighteen months ago, the impending departure of half its personnel was first seen by the other half, Dunham says, as a termination.

“In that moment, which didn’t last very long, it seemed that their leaving had to mean the breakup of the quartet,” he remembers. Immediately, however, both musicians considered another possibility.

“We thought again. In that second moment, which we shared with each other, Miwako and I decided the quartet meant too much to both of us to let it go. We decided to survive.” Thus began a transition period which may not be over yet.

“It wasn’t easy and it wasn’t cheap,” Dunham describes those months. “Looking for new members for an existing quartet, especially when you’re looking for two new members, entails great expense and great agonizing.”

During an extensive, five-month, transcontinental search, Watanabe and Dunham first found a first violinist and then the three members auditioned cellists. The two new members were first violinist Marsh--veteran of the late, lamented Lenox Quartet (1958-81), as well as, later, the Philadelphia and Berkshire Quartets--and young British cellist Marius May. They made their first appearances with the Sequoia in October, 1985.

Less than nine months later, May, with the blessings of his three partners, left California and returned to England to resume his solo career. May’s leaving, his former colleagues insist, was amicable.

Advertisement

Enter the veteran American cellist Bonnie Hampton, San Francisco-based, who joined the ensemble this past June, and makes her third appearance with it today at 2:30 p.m. when the quartet begins its new “. . . and Friends” season at the Japan America Theatre.

The featured friend at this opening concert of the year will be Nathan Schwartz, a highly regarded, Bay-Area pianist on the faculty of the San Francisco Conservatory. He also happens to be Hampton’s husband.

Officially, the foursome express confidence in the future of their ensemble.

In his typically quiet but authoritative way, Marsh says, unequivocally, “My feeling is just as positive with this group as it was in the old days of the Lenox Quartet.”

“In the sense that I feel confidence that this (combination of players) is going to work, I am very optimistic at this point,” Dunham adds. “Yes, it’s like starting over in some ways, but in others--in the fact that we have name recognition with the public, that we have a following, and that all of us are at a certain level of experience--we are ahead.”

“Am I just stubborn, or am I an idealist?” Watanabe asks, rhetorically. “This quartet has meant too much to me to let it go. Since I was a student in high school, I’ve always been in an ensemble. It’s part of my life. Now, with all this experience behind us, the idea of going different ways just doesn’t make sense.”

The present combination of players, she says, “may be the most rounded group we’ve had. I think it’s going to be good.”

Advertisement

Does she feel resentment about those who have left?

“No, not at all. I’m not sour, or bitter, or anything. I’ve gone past all that. I try to remember the good times, the good moments. I have nothing bad to say about anyone.”

When cellist May left, Watanabe remembers: “I wished him only good things. He should go after the solo career, if that is what he wants.”

On the other hand, Watanabe believes that she, as an experienced musician--who was Curtis-trained and spent six years in Europe as an ensemble player before coming to Los Angeles--is now, like Dunham, coming into her own.

“We don’t have to show off anymore. We’re beyond that. We are at the point where our experience is worth something, especially to us.”

Hampton is positive but guarded about her future with the quartet. After all, being a commuting member of this ensemble--one who has to travel from San Francisco to Los Angeles for rehearsals--can be, in Dunham’s word, tricky.

“Of course, the location can be a problem,” the cellist acknowledges. “About that, we can only say, ‘Let’s see how it works.’

“But there is something good in having to rely on these concentrated rehearsal periods, when I spend four or five days in Los Angeles. These are times when we rehearse all day long and think of nothing else. That’s an advantage.”

Advertisement

A lifelong chamber-music player, Hampton grew up near Berkeley, where the Griller Quartet was in residence at the UC campus.

“All during my teen-age years, I studied with the members of the Griller, and played quartets in that atmosphere. Years later, I spent four summers with Bobby Mann (first violinist of the Juilliard Quartet) at the Aspen Institute in Colorado. It was at that time that I got the taste for quartet playing again. I couldn’t be happier the way things have turned out.”

Marsh, who moved out to California to join the Sequoia last year, observes that many quartets are formed but few coalesce. The last two four-member ensembles he played in, for instance, “those were good musicians, but we never became a quartet.”

The current Sequoia ensemble, Marsh believes, “has a good chance of staying together. I’ve known Bonnie for more than 25 years--she’s a wonderful artist and also a real person. One does not make a genuine ensemble without that combination.”

The quartet repertory is so broad, and so rich, Marsh says, “that one can never get tired of it. There’s a whole world there. But finding the people for that world is not easy.

“There are many temptations. For a solid economic base, a musician cannot always do better than to join an orchestra. Orchestral players can make a whopping living. And, despite all the great strides we’ve made in chamber music in the past two decades--reaching many more people, becoming more organized in the national sense--it’s still touch and go, financially.”

Advertisement

That doesn’t necessarily mean, he adds, that great quartets have been lost to the world because the field doesn’t pay well.

“The only ones who even have a chance of becoming first-rate are the ones who do it out of love, anyhow. Any other motivation is suspect.”

Advertisement