Advertisement

Wanted: Collusion Remedy : A Knotty Process Will Start With Informal Meeting

Share
Times Staff Writer

Don Fehr, executive director of the Major League Players Assn., and Barry Rona, legal counsel to the owners’ Player Relations Committee, are scheduled to meet for lunch in Manhattan today. Besides what’s on the menu, there will be plenty of food for thought.

Baseball’s labor protagonists will begin a process designed to provide remedies in the wake of Monday’s ruling by arbitrator Tom Roberts in which he charged the owners with violating the collective bargaining agreement by conspiring to block free-agent movement during the winter of 1985-86.

It seems unlikely that Fehr and Rona can find solutions on their own. They agreed Tuesday that Roberts will make the final judgment in response to their recommendations.

Advertisement

This is called the penalty phase, and Roberts, reached at his office in Rolling Hills Estates Tuesday, said he has the authority “to frame any remedy that I deem appropriate.”

Roberts, however, said it would be inappropriate to comment on any aspect of his decision until the grievance is completed, but he denied telling the Associated Press, as the wire service reported Tuesday, that he may not issue his remedies until shortly before the start of the 1988 season.

“I couldn’t have said that because I don’t know how long it will take,” he said.

Fehr said Tuesday that he hoped to have the remedies in place by the end of the World Series so that the 1987 free agents have the opportunity to encounter a free market.

Rona, however, said he sees the penalty process lingering for months.

“In essence, Don seems to be saying that he wants salary arbitration for each of those 62 free agents (from the winter of 1985-86),” Rona said. “If that’s the case, you’re looking at months and months.”

Fehr refused to indicate what remedies or penalties he will pursue. He said he was still sorting out the legal complexities.

But Dick Moss, a former union lawyer who now represents Jack Morris, Andre Dawson, Fernando Valenzuela and a number of other top players, emerged from a planning session at the union’s New York office Tuesday and said that he strongly suspected that the union would seek punitive damages for the owners’ “blatant” attempt to destroy free agency in violation of the bargaining agreement, and an arbitration process through which the 62 free agents would be compensated for either the salary or maneuverability they may have lost in the closed market of 1985-86.

Advertisement

Rona said he would fight a recommendation for punitive damages because he doesn’t think any of the 62 players are even entitled to compensatory damages.

“Kirk Gibson got $4 million for three years and Donnie Moore got $3 million for three years,” he said, repeating his Monday theme. “How were they damaged?”

Neither, of course, received a competing offer and ultimately returned to his respective team--the Angels for Moore and the Detroit Tigers for Gibson.

That absence of movement over the last two years seems to concern most agents more than the lowering of salaries and may present the toughest challenge to the remedy process, since most clubs are likely to maintain a policy of financial restraint, insisting they can’t be forced to bid.

Kansas City General Manager John Schuerholz, for example, said Tuesday that the Royals simply got tired of being used as a pawn in the bidding process, dropped out even before the conspiracy charges developed and did not intend to return to that market.

He cited the Philadelphia Phillies’ signing of Lance Parrish last winter and the Chicago Cubs’ signing of Andre Dawson and said, “If you haven’t looked at the standings lately, I don’t think you’ll see a world championship coming to either Philadelphia or Chicago this season.”

Advertisement

Will the financial penalties be stiff enough to change that wide-spread perspective or does the system have to be reworked?

Rona said Tuesday that he wouldn’t discount the eventual possibility of changes in the current system, but seemed to suggest that they wouldn’t happen until this bargaining agreement expires in 1989.

Fehr said that all that’s needed to make the current system work again is a realistic approach by the owners.

“I’d like to believe they would now live with it,” he said. “They’ve had their day in court and the arbitrator has thrown out all that nonsense about coincidence, happenstance and economic problems. He didn’t buy any of it. Now we’re going to find out how many clubs can’t use Jack Clark or Dale Murphy or Jack Morris (who are all eligible for free agency this winter). Just like the Dodgers didn’t need Tim Raines, right?”

Raines went unsigned as a free agent last winter and ultimately returned to the Montreal Expos May 1. He is a factor in a second collusion grievance now being heard by another arbitrator, George Nicolau.

Player agent Tom Reich said Tuesday that both sides have talked about the possibility of appointing select committees to begin immediate work on a new free-agency system and, perhaps, that process should “start at once” if a “wipeout strike” is to be avoided in 1989, when the bargaining agreement expires. Reich said that the owners have removed the equity from the current system and that it can’t work if “Park Avenue continues to put caps on it.”

Advertisement

He alluded to the Manhattan office of Rona and Commissioner Peter Ueberroth, who remained unavailable for comment Tuesday. Ueberroth has been portrayed as architect of the owners’ conspiracy, and Roberts, in his 16-page decision, cited several owners’ meetings chaired by Ueberroth at which the need for financial responsibility was stressed and which were concurrent with the closing of the free-agent market.

“The major league baseball general managers met at Tarpon Springs, Fla., on Nov. 6, 1985,” wrote Roberts. “At that session the commissioner repeated his concern regarding the financial commitment made by the clubs under long-term player contracts and stated, ‘It is not smart to sign long-term contracts.’ He further described such signings as ‘dumb.’ ”

Roberts wrote that the commissioner was in Atlanta “on other business” when the Braves abruptly dropped out of discussions with Gibson’s agent and that the Royals had previously entertained Gibson on a postseason hunting trip, but that their interest cooled in the wake of October and November owners’ meetings.

Roberts also cited a memorandum distributed by former American League President Lee MacPhail in which MacPhail discussed the money wasted on long-term contracts and urged the clubs to display self-discipline. Roberts wrote that the commissioner urged the clubs to consider MacPhail’s message and conducted an informal poll as to how many clubs intended to avoid long-term contracts.

Roberts concluded that the message became clear, that the result of the meetings was that every club abstained from the free-agent market until an available free agent had been released by his former club with the announcement that the former club was no longer interested in his services.

The right of the clubs to pursue free agents “no longer remained an individual matter to be determined solely for the benefit of each club,” Roberts wrote. “The contemplated benefit of a common goal was substituted. This action constituted a violation of the prohibition against concerted conduct.”

Advertisement

Thus, Roberts was asked Tuesday, would it be correct to conclude that he viewed the commissioner as being at the heart of the conspiracy?

“I can’t comment on that at this time,” he said.

Advertisement