Anti-Gridlock Traffic Law

Much attention has recently been directed by the print and broadcast media toward the problem of gridlock in our busy intersections. Granted, this is a real and growing problem. However, why not place the responsibility where it belongs and approach the problem logically rather than using it as another opportunity to penalize the innocent, over-burdened motorist for a situation beyond his control?

At intersections heavily traveled during a significant part of the day, a left turn cycle of the traffic signal is not only justified but essential to reasonable control of traffic. But in many intersections, the need for such a cycle is either too sporadic to be economically practical or logistically impractical in the near future. In these intersections, an additional 10 or 15 second delay in signal changing, during which the signals for both streets remain red, would provide sufficient time to clear the intersection.

The thoughtlessly established solution of ticketing the innocent motorist who waits in the intersection for an opportunity to complete the left turn safely, rather than darting in front of oncoming traffic and thus creating a serious hazard, is grossly unfair and counterproductive.

Any semblance of traffic engineering and coordinated signal timing is sadly lacking in most of our Southland cities. The result is the need to stop and wait at nearly every intersection with a traffic signal. The idling internal combustion engine is at its least efficiency.

These comments are not meant so much as criticism as an appeal to the use of common sense and the consideration of the plight of the average law-abiding motorist who tries to make his way with the least possible hassle.

JOHN D. WATSON

Fullerton