Votes on the Initiatives
The voters of California have once again proven the political pundits wrong. Proposition 73, dismissed during the campaign as “the other campaign reform measure,” has turned out to be the overwhelming choice of the people. Proposition 73, heavily outspent by its rival measure--Proposition 68, provides needed campaign reform without spending the taxpayers’ money.
Political armchair jockeys are already explaining away the spectacular success of Proposition 73 by claiming that the voters were “confused” over the two campaign reform measures on the ballot. On the contrary, let’s give the voters credit for making a wise decision. While Proposition 68 had merit, its public financing provisions were unacceptable to many who support campaign reform. In addition, Proposition 73 applies to all offices (state and local), while Proposition 68 exempted constitutional officers such as the governor from contribution limits.
The big losers on Election Day were the power brokers and special interests who did everything they could to defeat both Proposition 73 and 68. Fortunately, the people of California had the final word.
SEN. JOSEPH B. MONTOYA
D-Whittier
Sacramento
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
