Advertisement

Teacher Troubles : Morale Dips as Talks Stall After 9 Months

Share
<i> Times Staff Writer</i>

Frustrated by their longest-ever contract dispute, teachers in the Whittier City School District have gone public, advertising their anger in a rented billboard, in a newspaper ad and by picketing.

Negotiations have stalled after nine months of talks, and members of the Whittier Elementary Teachers Assn. are not hesitating to express their displeasure. At a school board meeting last month, one teacher called board members “thieves” and another said they should be “tarred and feathered.”

For the record:

12:00 a.m. Feb. 16, 1989 For the Record
Los Angeles Times Thursday February 16, 1989 Home Edition Long Beach Part 9 Page 3 Column 1 Zones Desk 2 inches; 66 words Type of Material: Correction
The Paramount Unified School District has offered teachers a 2% salary increase, Supt. Richard B. Caldwell said. In a Feb. 9 story about teacher contract negotiations in several Southeast school districts, The Times incorrectly reported that the Paramount district had offered its teachers a 5% salary increase. Caldwell said a 5% salary increase already has been accepted by classified and management employees. Negotiations with teachers remain at an impasse.

“I’ve never seen the teachers as angry as they are now,” said Lotus Warren, a teacher in the district for 20 years. “The morale is going down the tubes.”

Advertisement

Other Districts Stalled

Whittier City’s 265 teachers are not the only ones in Southeast Los Angeles County working without a contract. The 500 teachers in the Paramount Unified School District are also in the midst of one of their longest-ever contract disagreements, and plan to picket school board meetings beginning Tuesday. In the Lynwood Unified School District, the district and union representing 560 teachers are nearing a contract agreement after five months of negotiations.

The tension level in the Whittier City district is rapidly approaching that of the Los Angeles Unified School District, where about 13,000 teachers were to take a strike vote late Wednesday, said Marilyn Stapleton, president of the Whittier Elementary Teachers’ Assn. The Whittier City union is in the next-to-last stage of the labor negotiation process mandated by state law before a strike vote can be taken.

“It’s all we’ve been able to do to stop the teachers from taking a strike vote too soon,” Stapleton said. “But we have to go through the (negotiating) channels first.”

Whittier City teachers are seeking a 7% pay increase and an improved benefits package. The school board has offered a 5% to 5 1/2% raise, which Supt. Neal J. Avery said is all the district can afford. Currently, the top pay for Whittier teachers is $41,635 a year, according to the California Teachers Assn.

“We don’t see any way to give the teachers what they want and keep the district solvent,” said Avery, noting that the 5,800-student district had to cut $700,000 from this year’s budget because of an 87-student enrollment drop after the Oct. 1, 1987, earthquake that seriously damaged parts of Whittier.

Although Whittier City teachers want a raise, Stapleton said the more significant problem is a lack of trust and respect between the union and district.

Advertisement

“We feel the district does not think of us as professionals, with regard to salary and recognition of the job we do,” Stapleton said, adding that she believes that only the resignation of Avery would lead to a speedy resolution of the contract dispute.

‘Trust Factor’ Needs Work

Avery, a 38-year employee of the Whittier City district, said contract discussions started becoming prolonged after the state mandated labor negotiations for school districts about 12 years ago.

He acknowledges that “the trust factor” needs some work, but he is at a loss about what to do. “I’d love to find some kind of format where the adversarial position left us,” Avery said, “but this lack of trust started way back, and I haven’t been able to change that.”

The trust level in the Whittier City district plummeted in November, when teachers began picketing schools and board meetings. In December, the union took out a half-page advertisement about the dispute in a local newspaper, and in January rented a Whittier Boulevard billboard announcing in bold black letters: “Whittier City, Home of 265 unhappy, unappreciated teachers!”

Then came the school board’s decision last month to place a two-minute limit on public speakers at board meetings.

The teachers were insulted by the action, saying the board passed the limit to try to silence those who wanted to complain about the negotiations. The board denied that the limit was aimed at teachers, but, “I will say our timing was poor,” acknowledged board member Janet Henke.

Advertisement

For the following meeting, the union organized a parade of about 30 parents and teachers who each spoke for two minutes about their dissatisfaction with the time limit and the district.

“Look at these sullen faces of people I really don’t like. I’m sick of this school board,” teacher Paul Thomas told the board at the meeting, adding that he would like to see them “tarred and feathered.”

The school board voted unanimously to rescind the speaking limit at its Monday meeting

At another meeting, a teacher called the board members “thieves” because of a dispute about the spending of $265,000 that had accumulated in a fund used to pay health insurance premiums for teachers. The surplus occurred when the teachers did not spend as much as had been anticipated on medical bills.

Avery said the district spent the money to supplement the state’s cost of living wage increase last year and to lease a school from the Los Nietos District while earthquake damage was repaired at Lincoln Elementary School.

Belonged to Teachers

The union believes the money still belongs to the teachers because the dollar figure for insurance had been negotiated in previous contracts. “The word thief isn’t too far off,” Stapleton said.

Starting with the 1988-89 school year, Whittier City teachers also were dealt a 50% increase in the cost of health care benefits. Teachers said the $265,000 could have been used to offset that increase, but Avery points out that the offset would only be for a year, after which teachers would still have to deal with the higher cost of insurance.

After a state-appointed mediator was unable to negotiate settlements in the Whittier City district, the contract process moved to what is known as “fact finding.” In the fact-finding process, both sides agree to have a third party investigate district finances to determine how much money is available for teacher salaries and benefits. The results of fact-finding are publicly disclosed, but are not binding.

Advertisement

In Whittier City, the parties have agreed upon a fact-finder and the process is scheduled to begin in about three weeks. Fact-finding is the last step the union has to fulfill before teachers can legally strike.

Mediator Scheduled

The Paramount Unified School District also has started the fact-finding process. A state mediator is scheduled to meet with both parties Feb. 28 to discuss disagreements about class size and preparatory periods for elementary and intermediate school teachers, said John Burritt, executive director of the Paramount Teachers Assn.

The 8,700-student Paramount district averages 30 or 31 students per class at the elementary and secondary schools, Burritt said.

“We would ultimately like to get that down in the low 20s,” Burritt said. “We’re looking for a commitment from the district to start that process next year and each year make progress toward whatever mutual goal we can agree on.”

District Supt. Richard B. Caldwell said class sizes in the low 20s are “a utopia that costs all kinds of money” since more teachers and classrooms would be required. “If we were to reduce one student in every class in the school district it would cost us half a million dollars,” Caldwell said.

Sizes Will Go Down

Proposition 98, approved by California voters in November, ultimately will result in smaller class sizes, Caldwell added, but no one knows how much smaller or how much it will cost.

Advertisement

The union and district have reached agreement on about 90% of the teachers’ contract demands, he said, including a 5% salary increase. Currently, the top salary is $41,378, according to the California Teachers Assn.

In the Lynwood Unified School District, the school board is seeking a three-year contract with the Lynwood Teachers Assn. Jewell Lee, the district’s negotiator, said contract discussions have been amicable and he expects to reach an agreement within a couple of months.

Negotiating “five months into the school year is not a long time,” Lee said. “We would get worried if they went into next year without a contract.”

He would not elaborate on the teachers’ demands. Several calls to the Lynwood Teachers Assn. were not returned.

Advertisement