Art Funds and Censorship
- Share via
Because Congress is funding the NEA, it argues it has the right to dictate the content of the artwork supported. But Congress is funding with tax dollars, your money, my money, and I don’t want Helms or Congress deciding for me what is or is not art, what is offensive or otherwise. Congress is not representing all viewpoints when it applies “limits,” funding only that which it finds agreeable. Democratic ideals are nurtured by supporting free expression for all.
Controversial art stimulates, forces each of us to solidify or redefine our beliefs, creates passionate dialogue. Consider the result of “legislated” art--safe, nonoffensive to any group. Pablum. If that’s what you enjoy, go behind the Iron Curtain and feast!
HELEN MOLLES
Seal Beach
More to Read
The biggest entertainment stories
Get our big stories about Hollywood, film, television, music, arts, culture and more right in your inbox as soon as they publish.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.