Pros and Cons of Decriminalizing Drugs the in U.S.

In response to “Cures Depend on Attitude, Not Programs” by Stanton Peele, March 14:

Yes, in spite of increases in money for treatment programs, it is evident that there is not enough of the right help for those who want and need it. Increases in private centers do not help the addict or alcoholic on the street who is without funds or insurance to pay for such treatment.

Addiction is a disease without a cure. It affects the body, mind, and soul of the victim, and some assistance in all three areas is required to effect and maintain staying free of the substance. This is as close as we have come to a cure, so far.

As for Alcoholics Anonymous, it was started when the medical community wanted no part of the addict or alcoholic. The AA program with “treatment supervised by former (a better term is recovering) addicts and alcoholics” has been successful for 55 years with its 12 steps.

No one can accomplish much change in his life while under the influence of drugs or alcohol which are mind-altering substances. (Cigarettes are not, by the way.) Detoxification is safest done under medical supervision, and more detox centers are desperately needed.

After detoxification, abstinence must be supported, and the addict should have all possible help to find alternative ways of coping with life. Outpatient and residential programs can do this, and can be a substitute for the “stable family.” With added help like job training and placement, these programs do work. I know from personal experience.

RUTH ANN RINK

Redondo Beach