Election Issues: S&Ls;, Abortion
- Share via
Your periodic reports on ad campaigns are very much appreciated--I hope you continue this service.
The July 25 item was a excellent example of the need for this analysis. The liquor industry’s attempt to use little old ladies and schoolteachers to confuse voters regarding Prop. 134 must be exposed.
A “yes” vote on Prop. 134 in November is a vote for a tax of a “nickel a drink” to pay for alcohol abuse prevention, rehabilitation, and education.
This is not a vindictive proposition--it is an attempt to have those who drink pay a fair share of the high cost to society of the abuse of alcohol.
NORMAN WOLLITZ
El Cajon
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
