Sen. Cranston Probe
The Senate Ethics Committee continues to display its awful use of bad judgment by reopening the case against Cranston. In desperation and seeking some way to regain a semblance of lost respect it now turns attention to a 76-year-old senator, a victim of cancer, and with 24 years of service in our government.
If they had to come up with something, they should have made an issue out of the banking and “rubber check” fiasco.
Most of these senators would do themselves and our country a favor if they were to follow Cranston’s decision to retire.
CLARENCE W. HAYWARD
Los Angeles
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
