When Kidnaper Is the Parent, Issues Become Complex : Families: A new book looks at why people abduct their own children and its effects. Ultimately, the authors say, custody should focus on the child’s welfare.

When Bob Shuman was 4 years old, his father picked him up from his mother’s house in Pennsylvania for a weekend visit and drove straight to Los Angeles. For the next 20 years, Shuman had virtually no contact with his mother.

He spent his childhood in California with his father and stepmother, pained and confused about a mother he was not permitted to mention.

And he was never allowed to express anger about being abducted.

“It was portrayed to me that my real mother was not a nice person, that my father saved me from that environment and that I was a lucky person,” says Shuman, who now lives in Baltimore. “In those days, the idea was to keep your mouth shut and go on. It was a family secret, one of those things that you don’t talk about.

“My stepmother was threatened by it, she wanted me to see her as my real mother. So the family system was ‘I needed to protect her feelings.’ . . . It was not until I was an adult that I could begin to deal with this.”

It has proved difficult for the 39-year-old Shuman to understand his parents: A mother who gave birth to him when she was 15 and later struggled with drug and alcohol abuse; a father who had initially hoped his wife would follow him to the West Coast if he used his son as bait.

Parental abduction can be not only traumatic but also terribly complex, say Geoffrey Greif and Rebecca Hegar, associate professors at the University of Maryland School of Social Work at Baltimore, in their book, “When Parents Kidnap: The Families Behind the Headlines.”.

The book is said to mark the first attempt to document parental kidnaping from the point of view of social science rather than criminal justice. It considers the situations of the children, the searching parents and the abductors.

The authors believe that civil and criminal definitions of parental abduction should become more uniform. They point out that in Texas, interference with child custody is a third-degree felony that applies to a parent who takes, retains or entices a child younger than 18 away from a custodial parent in violation of a court order.

In Maryland, however, it is only a misdemeanor to abduct a child under the age of 12 from a custodial parent--unless the child is taken out of state.

A recent study by the U.S. Department of Justice estimates that parental abductions run as high as 350,000 a year in the United States and that most occur in the summer months and after school holidays.

Although most of the children are returned to their homes within a week or so, according to Greif, as many as 160,000 children remain missing, and at risk, for longer periods of time. The longer a child is missing, the less likely a child will be returned to the custodial parent.

Ernie Allen, president of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, praises Greif and Hegar’s book and points to the Census Bureau’s projected divorce rates--about half of all marriages in the United States will end in divorce--as an indication that abductions may increase.

“There are still all of these underlying assumptions that parental abduction is a civil problem: a problem of domestic relations, something the lawyers should work out,” he says. “People still think that if the kidnaped child is with a parent, that’s not someone who is going to hurt them.

“The single most powerful bit of data for us addresses parents’ motive for kidnaping: It turns out that 80% of the parents take a child from anger or to get revenge, and not as an act of love. And when a child is taken out of those circumstances, it’s clear he or she is going to be used as a pawn. And that the child is a victim.”

The authors evaluated detailed questionnaires from 371 parents left behind in abductions as well as talking to abducted children and their abductors. They found that more than half of the abductors were reported violent and that a third of those parents left behind said that they had also been accused of being violent or had engaged in acts of family violence. In many situations, both parents posed a threat to their children.

However, Greif and Hegar discovered a variety of circumstances leading to kidnaping:

* Non-custodial parents felt acutely isolated from their children.

* The parents felt that the children were being turned against them.

* The parents resented the sense of being replaced by stepparents.

* Others fled with their children from households in which they were physically abused.

“There aren’t always good guys and bad guys or good gals and bad gals,” Greif says. “It’s a very complex issue, obviously, and everyone has their own take on it. It’s hard to figure out what has gone on in these relationships to get to the point where somebody feels they have to kidnap their child, throw off their old life and assume a new identity in a new city, state, or even country.”

Much of the prior research, written from the viewpoint of the legal system, sees abducted children and their searching parents merely as victims of crime.

“Some people think all parental abductions are abuse,” says Hegar. “We have tried to look at the different underlying patterns.”

The authors believe that the legal system should consider various circumstances surrounding an abduction. Before assessing a penalty, criminal codes should look at motivation, harm and other circumstances--just as they do for the act of killing.

“What do you do with a child that has been with an abductor for a year or more?” says Greif. “Is it OK to send the child back to the searching parent? What if the abductor is the parent who initially had the better bond with the child? What about the searching parent’s rights? What about visitation from the abductor? Is it OK for that person to have contact with the child?”

The act of abducting children often reflects the failures of the child custody process, Allen says.

“It’s not to excuse it, but there are parents who do this out of desperation. Because the custody process is so adversarial, it almost invites parents to create allegations against the other spouse,” he says. “We would like to see the process of child custody focus more on the welfare of the child.”