Extensive Plan Fails to Alleviate Homelessness : Santa Monica: The city’s policies are being criticized for making matters worse. Those on the streets aren’t very happy either.
Two years ago, Santa Monica adopted what is believed to be the nation’s first sweeping program to alleviate homelessness. But today, the city’s homelessness problem is as bad as ever.
Some say worse.
Santa Monica residents, along with millions who visit the city each year, still encounter homeless-related problems rivaling those of major metropolitan downtown areas across the country.
People are accosted at bank money machines by beggars offering to wash car windows. Panhandling is rampant in commercial areas, with some brazen enough to snatch food from the plates of restaurant patrons eating outdoors. Residents shy away from city parks because large enclaves of transients have turned these public spaces into campgrounds.
“It’s as bad or worse than ever,” said Herb Katz, who voted for the plan two years ago when he was a member of the City Council. “The public is furious.”
And scared. “People feel threatened,” said Santa Monica Police Chief James T. Butts. “The public won’t put up with it anymore.”
Then there’s the continuing frustration at what the homeless themselves must endure--the filth, the hunger, the lack of medical and psychiatric attention--all amid relative affluence. Such conditions prompt some to recommend more help, rather than a crackdown. Indeed, many city residents got a firsthand look at homelessness after the Jan. 17 earthquake, which drove hundreds of apartment- and home-dwellers to emergency shelters and makeshift encampments.
Said Elizabeth Noble Lee, who was staying in a Red Cross shelter after the quake left her Topanga Canyon home without electricity, water or gas: “Being here, I realize how close I could have come. It’s a rude awakening.”
Evaluating Santa Monica’s homeless policies is important these days: Other cities from New York to Seattle are launching major homeless programs of their own. Santa Monica’s plan, developed by a citizens Task Force on Homelessness after months of toil, is viewed by many officials elsewhere as a test case for their efforts.
The program, approved in December, 1991, is part carrot and part stick. Under the program, the city has moved to speed construction of homeless housing, moved the homeless feeding program off the City Hall lawn and prohibited encampment in city parks.
At the time, the plan was hailed by City Council members as a way to forge an alliance between those who wanted to crack down on the homeless and those who wanted the city to embrace them.
It was a sharp departure from the city’s previous philosophy, which frowned on restrictions that might make homeless people feel unwelcome.
Santa Monica has not made much headway. Signs of the large homeless population abound.
At Memorial Park, carts and boxes of belongings line the fence. People bed down on the tennis courts, in adjacent alleys and on the grass. The fences on the tennis courts at Lincoln Park serve as laundry lines and makeshift headboards for folks who lean their gear or themselves up against them.
Because of construction, Palisades Park has had a recent reprieve from its former notoriety as a homeless encampment with an ocean view.
“They finally found a way to clean up Palisades Park,” quipped one Westsider. “They fenced it off.”
The lack of visible progress after two years of work is partly a result of the city’s philosophy of homeless services. That philosophy favors focusing social service resources on long-term solutions for a few people rather than shelter for many.
There is, however, enough emergency help--clothes, meals and assistance getting general relief money--to maintain people, albeit barely, on the streets. It’s also enough, however, to keep the homeless coming to town.
*
City Manager John Jalili says Santa Monica’s uphill struggle with homelessness shows that a small city, no matter how dedicated, can’t solve a regional problem, especially when other locales aren’t doing their fair share. That regional problem has clearly worsened in the past year because of the lingering recession and cuts in welfare.
Moreover, the homeless task force never pretended that its recommendations would cause the homeless to go away, says Vivian Rothstein, a task force member. The goal, rather, was to gain community consensus on some approaches to the homeless problem, ending a political battle royal over the issue.
But others contend the liberal forces that control the City Council may lack the political will to make life more difficult for homeless people who refuse to adhere to tougher standards of behavior.
Among the evidence cited by such critics:
* To protest the passage of a law to close down the parks after midnight, about 40 homeless people last summer lived on the City Hall lawn for months, blocking the entrance and urinating under the office windows of city workers. The city allowed them to remain on the lawn so as not to violate their rights.
* At a televised public hearing on the parks measure, Mayor Judy Abdo lashed out at Butts, demanding to know why a uniformed police officer had appeared in the doorway at the back of the council chambers. She said she was afraid his presence would upset the homeless people in the audience “while we were doing something difficult for (them) to hear.”
“People talk about tough love,” City Councilwoman Asha Greenberg said. “We’ve had all the love part, but none of the tough part.”
Homeless people are no happier. They agree that the situation is worse than ever, but not because the city is being too kind.
“It’s getting worse because we’re getting more police harassment,” said Michael Flenoy, who lives in Memorial Park, where he played Little League baseball several decades ago. “Where you want us to go? They run us out of everywhere we go.”
No one is accusing the city of not trying to address homelessness. Under the new zoning rules allowing speedier construction of homeless shelters, plans are in the works for three separate projects--mostly for individuals and families in transition from homelessness to permanent housing. SHWASHLOCK, a program to provide showers, lockers and coin-operated laundry vouchers for the homeless, got under way last fall.
Even those who say the homeless problem is worse than ever point to one welcome change under the city’s homeless program--removing the trademark homeless feeding service from the City Hall lawn. It was moved to three indoor locations and linked with other homeless services.
Parks are posing the toughest challenge to the city’s homeless policy.
*
City staffer Julie Rusk acknowledged that the situation in the parks has gotten so out of kilter that maintenance workers are afraid to pick up the trash near homeless people for fear they would be accused of violating their rights.
But that is about to change, Rusk said. Two years into the plan, she said, “We’re just starting to work on the parks.”
The city has already passed three laws affecting the use of parks by homeless people. But enforcement has proved difficult. Two of the measures--one that prohibits encampments in public places and another that requires permits for large groups that want to use the parks--have been challenged in court.
