U.S. Executive

Your report “Singapore Keeps U.S. Executive From Leaving” (Aug. 30) alleged that Singapore was prosecuting Robert Freehill as part of a vendetta against the Freehill family in particular, and the United States in general.

The prosecution of Freehill for assault and using offensive language has nothing to do with his son Stephen Freehill, or with new U.S. Ambassador Timothy A. Chorba. It is simply the law taking its course.

Freehill was charged for breaking the law on three separate occasions. Police investigations into the first incident, which happened in December, 1992, were hampered and delayed by Mrs. Freehill’s repeated refusal to cooperate with and make a statement to the police. While the police pursued this matter, the second and third incidents occurred. The complainants in the three cases lodged separate police reports. The police duly investigated and satisfied themselves of the truth of these reports before charging Freehill. The trial will take place in open court. Freehill can be defended by counsel of his choice. The court has to satisfy itself on the evidence before Freehill is convicted.

Your correspondent described the prime minister’s National Day speech as “an unprecedented propaganda campaign attacking the United States and American values.” The prime minister cited examples of problems not only in the U.S., but also in Britain, New Zealand, other European countries and Taiwan. The examples and quotes came from media reports. The facts are a matter of public record. The prime minister highlighted them not to attack these countries, but to educate Singaporeans as to why our society should reinforce traditional values, uphold the family unit and eschew state welfare.

A. SELVERAJAH, Charge d’Affaires, Singapore Embassy, Washington