Advertisement

CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS / U.S. SENATE : Feinstein, Huffington Slugging Out Final Rounds : Incumbent launches three new TV ads. Challenger appears before Rush Limbaugh fan club and urges supporters to get out the vote.

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITERS

As America’s most expensive congressional race in history headed into its final weekend, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Republican challenger Mike Huffington jabbed at each other Saturday while concentrating on making sure their core supporters vote.

Feinstein urged on Democrats in Santa Monica, West Hollywood and Van Nuys. Huffington met with Republican groups in Orange County, San Diego, Palm Springs and Bakersfield.

Feinstein launched a blitz on the state’s television screens, broadcasting three new commercials backed with an advertising budget for the final week of more than $1.5 million. Still, Huffington’s unprecedented $28-million campaign was expected to continue outspending the incumbent.

Advertisement

“We have got to win this election,” Feinstein told her supporters. “I have won and I have lost elections. I have never felt it was so important, that the integrity of the whole process was more at stake, than it is in this election. That a United States Senate seat could be bought by someone who I am convinced cares not one whit about the people or California would be terrible.”

Rep. Huffington (R-Santa Barbara) reminded his troops in San Diego how far they have come.

“We were 30 points behind, what they call an unwinnable race,” the candidate said. “Now we are in a statistical dead heat and we need for you to get out and vote and to call 10 people you know and get them to vote on Election Day.”

In addition to showing that the race is very close, recent polls indicate that Huffington and Feinstein have pounded each other so much that neither can claim to be liked by even half of the state’s voters. Political analysts say an unusually large portion of the electorate remains undecided in the Senate race because they are disgusted with both of their choices.

The upshot is that experts believe the winner may well receive less than 50% of the vote, which has happened only twice in the last 60 years of California U.S. Senate races--with Barbara Boxer in 1992 and Alan Cranston in 1986.

As the candidates stumped for votes in the Southland, both campaign headquarters were also furious with activity. Among the developments Saturday:

* Feinstein’s three new television commercials included one attacking her opponent, another comparing their records of accomplishment in Washington and a third--only to be shown on cable television channels--that highlights the senator’s endorsement by eight newspapers.

Advertisement

One ad attacks Huffington for admitting recently that he violated federal law by employing an illegal immigrant nanny for more than four years.

Feinstein employed a housekeeper from Guatemala for about three years, ending in 1983. The senator has maintained that she did nothing improper because when the woman was hired she showed documents indicating she was in the country legally.

On Friday, officials from the Immigration and Naturalization Service said the housekeeper entered the country legally but her visa only allowed her to work at the Guatemalan Consulate and even that permission expired while she worked for Feinstein.

The senator’s campaign has said that Feinstein’s case is different from Huffington’s employment of an illegal immigrant nanny until last year because a 1986 federal law made such hiring a crime. Huffington has blamed his wife for the hiring decision but conceded that federal immigration and tax laws were broken.

Feinstein has shown records demonstrating that she paid taxes and Social Security on her employee.

“Congressman Huffington admits he broke federal immigration law,” the ad says. “Dianne Feinstein broke no federal immigration laws.”

Advertisement

* The Republican campaign released a letter Saturday from Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) asking why the INS is not investigating Huffington’s charge that a Santa Barbara reporter approached his former nanny and claimed to be a Feinstein campaign operative. The Huffington campaign contends that the reporter, who has denied the allegation, offered the nanny a green card if she would talk about her work at the Huffington household.

* Huffington officials also produced a 1988 letter that appeared to be written by Feinstein as she tried to help her former housekeeper, Anabella Piaz, gain permanent residency in the United States. The campaign said the letter indicates Feinstein knew of her housekeeper’s illegal status because it says, “Anabella’s immigration status has been somewhat mixed up during the years.”

But Feinstein officials said the letter does not contradict what the senator has said all along, that she believed her housekeeper had permission to be in the country when she was hired. On the campaign trail, Feinstein said, “When I hired this person in 1980, she submitted to me documentation which I believed was correct. I have broken no laws. Mr. Huffington has. What he is doing . . . is kind of a last-ditch, desperation effort.”

* Feinstein’s campaign released its own letter from a fellow congressman on Saturday in which Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.) complained to Huffington that one of his campaign mailers is misleading. Kerrey charged that a photograph in the mailer of the candidate’s father wearing a Navy uniform was intended to imply that the candidate is a military veteran even though he has no service record.

“This deceit is an insult to every veteran who has served this country,” said Kerrey, who won the Medal of Honor as a Navy SEAL in Vietnam. “For you to imply that you have served in our country’s military when you did not is shameful.”

Huffington’s day began in Orange County, where the candidate attended a breakfast rally with the fan club of conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh.

Advertisement

Huffington told the audience of about 160 people that he favored reduced government regulation, a cut in capital gains taxes and increased defense spending. Then he charged that his opponent cast votes in Congress to benefit her husband’s business.

“Can you imagine a senator voting to enrich themselves?” he said to a roar of approval.

Proposition 187, the ballot measure that would bar illegal immigrants from public education and non-emergency health care benefits, was also a popular target for the gathering. Bob Forsberg, chapter president of a Rush Limbaugh fan club, set the tone for the appearance with a joke that referred to Proposition 187 supporters as “low riders.”

“There are some people who are against Proposition 187 who are down at the bottom of the road,” Forsberg said. “They would like to come up here, but the low-riders can’t get over the speed bumps.”

When Huffington spoke later, he endorsed Forsberg’s campaign for City Council in Lake Forest. “‘We have to elect politicians--whether it is Bob (Forsberg) or (Newport Beach Assemblyman) Gil Ferguson or anyone else who is running--who will tell the truth,” Huffington said.

Huffington also returned to a favorite theme in recent days--that the “liberal” media, and the Los Angeles Times in particular, favor Feinstein and are trying to block stories about her employment of the housekeeper. He called the paper’s coverage of the issue “a cover-up.”

“This is what we are up against, the liberal media,” Huffington said. “You know something, thank God for Rush Limbaugh! This man is telling the truth and thank God someone is willing to stand up and do it.”

Advertisement

Feinstein skipped an appearance Saturday with President Clinton in Oakland as campaign officials decided instead to focus the senator’s attention on the key battleground of Southern California. Feinstein has already appeared with the president four times during her campaign, including two events in Los Angeles on Friday.

Feinstein attended rallies for her supporters in West Hollywood, Santa Monica and the San Fernando Valley. When she accepted a giant greeting card signed by dozens of supporters, Feinstein emotionally thanked the audience.

“There is a lot of grief in what I do,” she said, wiping at her eyes. “This is one of the nicest moments I’ve had in this entire campaign. When you work hard you really don’t expect that anybody is going to say, ‘Thank you.’ And suddenly when they do, you find that it’s a very, very emotional experience.”

Also contributing to this report was Times staff writer Jim Rainey.

Advertisement