Judges and Scouts

Re “Boy Scout Issue Splits State’s Judges,” Feb. 8: The politically correct crowd are attempting to violate the First Amendment rights of Judge John Farrell by trying to tell him who he can and cannot peacefully assemble with. In this case, the judge wishes to assemble with a law-abiding group that holds moral values that are similar to his own. The Boy Scouts of America also have the right to set standards of behavior for their members, so they can practice their First Amendment right to peacefully assemble.

Should a vocally talented straight man be allowed to force his way into a gay men’s choir, against the wishes of group members who do not share his sexual preference?

CHESTER BURTCH

Lakewood

As I read the article, I had a frightening vision of a totalitarian state where every thought, every action, is monitored and controlled.

Judge Stephen Lachs is right when he says this “is an issue of the perception of fairness.” His perception of fairness is like my father’s, “Let’s compromise. Let’s do it my way.” If I were a Catholic, or a biker, or a vegetarian, that is my choice. I do not expect everyone to condone or approve. However, I do expect them to be tolerant. But they have their own lives and interests. Why do gays feel justified only when everyone not only approves, but embraces?

Let’s not make this “an issue of the perception of fairness.” Let’s make this issue a reality of fairness. Let people live their lives according to their own interests and beliefs. Yes, we must encourage tolerance and compassion and respect. But can we demand it? No. We can force people to behave, but we cannot force them to be good. Demanding defeats the purpose and will only breed intolerance, disgust and hate.

SALLY S. ENGLISH

Downey