Sentencing Reform

I disagree with your argument that sentencing differences between crack and powdered cocaine need to be reexamined (editorial, Nov. 22). You state the disparity in sentencing is due to the perceived difference in criminal behavior, then argue that research, showing neither form being significantly more addictive, argues strongly for elimination of the discrepancies.

If addictive qualities are to be the basis of sentencing structures, shouldn’t tobacco be pretty close to cocaine? I would feel much more comfortable with your suggestion if a sociological study showed no significant difference in criminal behavior (gang activity, murder, armed robbery, etc.) related to the use of these substances.

There are plenty of precedents for different regulation of different forms or concentrations of the same drug. Consider vodka versus beer, hashish versus marijuana, and heroin versus poppy seed rolls.

I do agree with a need for a comprehensive review of our drug policies and laws.

JOSEPH AREEDA

Los Angeles