Bar Patrons Still Smoke Despite Ban

Los Angeles County health officials have sent notices to at least 104 Los Angeles-area bars where authorities say patrons or employees ignore the new state law against smoking.

But county and city authorities acknowledge that the letters may be meaningless because enforcement of the ban, which took effect Jan. 1, is likely to be spotty. They said the statute is riddled with loopholes that could allow smoking to continue in bars.

Under the ban--the final piece of a landmark 1995 workplace anti-smoking law to take effect--authorities can fine taverns that intentionally permit smoking and the smokers.

But as local law enforcement and business owners struggle to translate the statute into real-world use, a number of bars skirt the ban by meeting only the minimum requirements: posting a “No Smoking” sign, asking patrons not to smoke--and then allowing them to light up anyway.

That was the case Monday night at the Bull’s Eye Grill & Tavern in Northridge, where bartender Suzette Chontos served beer and some legal interpretation to the smokers at the counter.

“If you’re a smoker, you’re a smoker. They can still come in here,” she said. When one patron sauntered up and drew a cigarette from his pocket, she said, “As you know, it’s against the law.” When he nodded, she nudged an ashtray in his direction.

“As of now,” she said, “it’s business as usual.”

Under the law, authorities can cite a bar owner or patron with a $100 fine for the first offense. The penalty can increase to $500 for repeated offenses and to $7,000 if Cal/OSHA concludes that smoking endangered employees in their workplace.

Enforcement is left to cities and counties, and officials in certain parts of the state are cracking down on smoking harder than others.

Los Angeles city officials say they are taking a softer approach, issuing two warning letters before a law enforcement agent is sent to inspect a bar.

County tobacco control Director Ingrid Lamirault and state officials said that they may have to count on the bar owners to enforce the statute.

“We’re at a stage with this new law where we don’t have concrete enforcement procedures in place,” Lamirault said. But “having cigarette police go out is not the way to make this public health law work.”

Some local investigators say the statute is poorly written and nearly impossible to enforce.

“If you post the signs, you can allow all the smoking you want,” said Los Angeles Fire Capt. John Kitchens, who runs the legal liaison unit that inspects bars for the city. “The owner has no control over the patrons.”

Many bar owners agree and tout what they believe is a ticket-proof way to obey the law without irritating smokers.

“It’s a matter of complying with the letter of what it said,” said South Bay Beverage Assn. President David Berryhill. At Berryhill’s Bac Street Lounge in Redondo Beach, patrons are asked to sign a log confirming that they have been told that it is illegal to smoke in the bar and that management has posted a “No Smoking” sign.

“If you [still] choose to smoke, we’re going to get you an ashtray and ask you what you want to drink,” he said.

At Ireland’s 32 in Van Nuys, bartender Alan Singleton said he rigidly applied the ban for the first few days after it took effect, but thought twice when business dwindled. By the end of the first week, the bar decided to comply only with the letter of the law, and its smoking customers returned.

“It was either do it or go under,” Singleton said. Now “we have to inform them it’s against the law, then, let ‘em smoke.”

At the Gold Apple in Northridge, patrons bring their own ashtrays. At the Blue Cafe in Long Beach, management has erected a tent over the patio so patrons can smoke outdoors. But owner Vince Jordan noted that if someone smokes inside after being asked not to, the bar is “off the hook.”

“They have to use reasonable steps to prevent smoking--that is what the statute requires,” said Assistant Los Angeles City Atty. Jolaine Harkless, whose office would have to prosecute offenders.

“There may be some issues raised because this provision [posting signs and ignoring offenders] is coming into play,” she said. “Some of these questions may have to be answered down the line.”

Bar owners have vetted the new law for other loopholes. Because the law is part of the labor code and is designed to protect employees from exposure to smoke, some bars have tried to become “owner-operator” businesses with no employees.

Another section of the law permits bar employees who fear “physical harm” to let patrons smoke; state authorities worry that bartenders may use that as an excuse to not enforce the ban.

“If they take all the steps the law says they have to take, they would not be liable,” said Paul Hunting, a health education consultant for the state Department of Health Services. A patron who ignores the bar’s request to put out a cigarette may be fined, but Hunting said he knew of no instance when that has happened since smoking became illegal in restaurants in 1995.

“It’s going to take some education and consistent enforcement” to make the law work, he said. “In places like Los Angeles, which has almost 7,700 bars, you can’t get to everyone right away.”

But while authorities grapple with how to enforce the ban, bar owners who have barred smoking outright say they are losing business to bars with a more laissez faire environment.

“If they get away with it, we’re definitely going to be hurt,” said bartender Larry Bolen at the Valley Inn in Sherman Oaks, which refuses to serve patrons who are smoking.

“We’ve had some cigar smokers say they’re not going to come back. I don’t know where they go.”