Advertisement

Residents See Red Over First Traffic Light in Topanga Canyon

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

It’s not normally news when a community installs a traffic light.

Then again, Topanga’s not your normal community.

For the past few months, this rustic, close-knit enclave has been split over its first-ever street light, a signal on Topanga Canyon Boulevard designed to protect the children who attend a nearby elementary school.

At stake is the very nature of Topanga, opponents say. The traffic light is the beginning of the end of the counterculture community’s small-town feel.

But some Topanga parents don’t want their child-filled vehicles smashed by drivers speeding on the boulevard, an increasingly popular alternate route to the Westside for commuters from the west San Fernando Valley and Ventura County.

Advertisement

One community meeting on the matter attracted 70 people. County officials entered the fray. Even the California Assembly speaker pro tem, who represents the area, was drawn into the debate.

The signal, now under construction, has also inspired guerrilla tactics: Some Topanga drivers purposefully cut their speed in half when approaching the school zone, creating minivan-sized traffic gaps for those who must turn across oncoming traffic to drop off children. It drives other commuters crazy.

Caltrans officials say it is a first. With many cities and towns begging for street lights to slow speed-crazed drivers, Topanga is the only community in recent memory to actually try to block a stoplight.

But residents say the brouhaha should come as no surprise for a community that has long cherished its splendid isolation: the horse trails, the houses tucked in crannies, the lack of a single hip vodka bar with limos out front.

They’re willing to fight to maintain it--even if the menace is only a single traffic light.

“It’s a Topanga thing,” said Cynthia Riddle, 48, the mother of a Topanga Elementary fourth-grader and self-described ex-hippie. “We’re an island of sorts. Most of us would prefer to keep it that way.”

Advertisement

But that green-first philosophy has other parents seeing red.

“Most of the people who are opposed to this are ‘60s throwback hippies,” said Shannon Colburn, 37, who has a third-grader at Topanga Elementary. “Is it going to take a child getting killed for everybody to wake up? This is the ‘90s. For there to be no signal is ridiculous.”

The seeds of the controversy were sown in 1995, when Topanga Elementary School’s former principal wrote a letter urging Caltrans to study the intersection of Topanga Canyon Boulevard and Topanga School Road, which leads from the boulevard to the school a short distance away.

Caltrans discovered that parents trying to turn in and out of the school were facing long waits. Although few major accidents had happened, there had been several close calls.

The numbers went into a formula and out popped the result: A traffic light was needed. The process crept along for two years as Caltrans searched for funding and bid out the job.

Then, last fall, rumors spread about the impending construction of a traffic signal. Suddenly, Topangans realized that their virgin stretch of road was about to be violated by a traffic light.

The rebellion had begun.

First was a meeting arranged by Democratic Assemblywoman Sheila J. Kuehl, speaker pro tem. Representatives from county Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky’s office showed up. Then came the meeting where nearly all of the 70 people in attendance voiced displeasure at the light. Then came another meeting.

Advertisement

The reaction stunned Caltrans officials, who were ready to break ground on the project. Normally, they come in, hang the light and leave. No mess. No fuss. And certainly no public input.

“It was a very unusual situation,” said Tom Choe, senior traffic engineer for the project. “Everybody wants a signal. People are fighting for signals. They actually opposed it.”

To satisfy the protesters, Caltrans agreed to perform another study in September. As it turned out, the number of cars using the boulevard during peak morning hours had zoomed in two years from 1,233 vehicles per hour to 1,778 per hour, a 44% increase.

Once again, it was clear that the area needed a traffic signal. But some Topangans still weren’t convinced.

“I just didn’t think it met the criteria,” said Virgil Mirano, a freelance photographer who fears that the light will cause more rear-end accidents.

As an alternative to the light, some parents began car-pooling. Others started arriving at the school earlier. Riddle started the go-slow pact where parents coming from the north would slow down and allow parents driving from the south to turn left into the school.

Advertisement

Then, to see what effects their techniques were having, Topanga officials stood by the side of the boulevard and did their own car count. They found about 1,200 cars going by per hour. They insisted the light was overkill.

Caltrans wouldn’t cancel plans for the signal but did agree to modifications. While the light should be in place by mid-February, it will be stop-and-go only during school hours. The rest of the time it will simply flash. And it may be hooded completely during the summer months.

“Caltrans was in the dark about the way we do things in Topanga,” said Dale Robinette, the president of the Topanga Canyon Town Council. “There’s a lot of community input. Compromises are struck. We in Topanga resist urbanization.”

Indeed, on a recent school day, hardly a parent could be found who favored the new light. Despite several close calls, including one in which a Volvo wagon with ski racks on top had to slam on its brakes to avoid one of the slowing Topanga parents, several parents said they were adamantly opposed to the light.

“I think it’s horrible, horrible, horrible,” said Dorothianne Henne, a parent at the school. “It’s all these namby-pamby yuppies living in the Palisades who want Topanga to be the Highlands. Topanga is a rugged place. You’ve got to be rugged.”

Other parents view the traffic light with mixed feelings. Sure, the signal is needed. Busy roads. Dangerous intersections. More commuters.

Advertisement

It’s a sign of the times.

Just not a good one.

“It’s sad to think that Topanga has grown to the point where we have to do this,” said Rosi Dagit, parent of a third-grader. “I regret losing our no-light canyon.”

Advertisement