Advertisement

Costly Web Site Error

Share

It’s been a rough couple of weeks for online retailers. E-Trade Group Inc. is facing at least one class-action lawsuit after its computer system crashed four times and blocked many investors from placing orders and making trades. Amazon.com Inc. faced criticism over its editorial bias when the online bookshop charged publishers for book endorsements.

But the biggest news came from Aliso Viejo-based Buy.com, the online retailer whose marketing slogan claims the firm has the “lowest prices on Earth.”

Over the weekend of Feb. 6, the company mistakenly offered users a computer monitor at far below its actual selling price. For 48 hours, a high-end Hitachi SuperScan 753 monitor, which normally retails for $588, was offered at a mere $164.50.

Advertisement

Word spread quickly on Usenet newsgroups about the deal. By Monday morning, company officials said they had nearly 1,600 orders for the monitor.

In a statement, Buy.com said it honored the $164.50 price for the 143 monitors it had in stock. It canceled all the other orders.

“It was an unfortunate, honest mistake, and companies are allowed to make mistakes,” said company founder Scott Blum.

But the company’s decision has spawned a public outcry among angry customers, who are complaining in Internet newsgroups. Many have suggested a boycott of the retailer, which has attributed the faulty price to human error.

Consumers have also complained to the Better Business Bureau of Orange County, which has 46 recent complaints against Buy.com.

Last Monday, the firm posted a new policy on the legal page of its Web site: “In the event a product is listed at an incorrect price due to typographical error or error in pricing information received from our suppliers, Buy.com shall have the right to refuse or cancel any orders placed for product listed at the incorrect price . . . .”

Advertisement

Whether that disclaimer protects Buy.com from legal liability is unclear, Federal Trade Commission staff members say. Regulators note that such issues, which fall under state law, can become murky when applied to Internet firms that do business in all 50 states.

Advertisement