Environmentalists and Religion

I am troubled by your recent account of religious environmentalism (Dec. 25). There are many cogent, practical, even idealistic reasons for living carefully on this Earth. It is unnecessary to bring in theological arguments regarding “God’s garden” or to use scriptural admonitions as the environmental rallying call. Let us not blur the lines between what is in our best interest as thoughtful, reasonable people and what we believe (or do not believe) about a creator who has a special relationship with mankind.

I believe the majority of those with strong religious convictions are tolerant, well-meaning individuals. However, those who believe they have an inside track on the truth may attempt to use religious environmentalism as a tool to promote their sectarian agenda. What appears on the surface to be a broadly based ecumenical concern for Mother Earth could break down into narrow disputes over religious dogma. That would be a sorry source of pollution, indeed.

NANCY SANDWEISS, Bonita, Calif.

*

The problem I have with most institutionalized religions is that doctrine and ritual take precedence over spiritual practice, which should include protecting the planet and the unprotected who inhabit it--animals as well as the weak and the vulnerable. Tending a garden is a form of prayer in which you pay homage to the divinity in everything that grows, honoring diversity as well as life.

Spiritual practice sometimes requires political acts to support it.

BARBARA SNADER, Los Angeles