Scholars’ Changing View of Judas

* Times religion writer Larry Stammer presents an interesting case for viewing Judas as a collaborator with Jesus in the events leading to the crucifixion, rather than as his betrayer (‘New Look at Ancient Betrayer,” April 21). Some might see this as a way of resurrecting the reputation of Judas, appropriately at Easter. If Judas was a friend of Jesus rather than his betrayer, it makes his final act one of nobility rather than treachery.

However, in this case, Judas no longer stands as a symbol of hope for those who desperately need the grace of forgiveness, a point which I make in my book, “The Gospel According to Judas: Is There a Limit to God’s Forgiveness?” There may be a bit of Judas in most of us. And this Judas needs mercy and forgiveness, not redefinition.

RAY S. ANDERSON

Professor of Theology and Ministry

Fuller Theological Seminary

Pasadena

*

It seems that many of today’s Bible scholars and religion writers are no longer in search of spiritual truth but rather political correctness. To portray Judas Iscariot as a victim or co-conspirator of Jesus’ planning clearly demonstrates their modern-day liberalism. Trouble is this breed of scholars obviously lacks the divine inspiration of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul et al.

Stammer states, “You don’t have to be a New Testament scholar--or even a Christian--to be fascinated by a character like Judas.” True. But what is more fascinating is that this story has not yet ended. Like the pop culture musical, “Jesus Christ Superstar,” Stammer leaves Jesus dead on the cross. All of this is simply an attempt to rewrite history on man’s terms and another effort to damage and destroy the faith of Christ’s believers that forms the very foundation of Christianity.

ROBERT FUENTES

Upland