Advertisement

Coming at Transit From 2 Directions

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITERS

Two dramatically differing versions of Southern California’s transportation future intersected Thursday, one as bleak as rush-hour traffic, the other a dream in progress to link Northern and Southern California with high-speed rail.

The sweeping plans envision projects as disparate as carving a new freeway through the shrinking Orange County wilderness and high-speed trains whisking commuters from San Francisco to San Diego as fast as 200 mph.

Whether any of the more imaginative ideas will ever come to fruition remains to be seen.

The two plans--one by the Southern California Assn. of Governments, which painted a dismal version of the future, the other by the California High-Speed Rail Authority, were a mix of hard realities and wistful dreams.

Advertisement

Because both developments involve planning documents, they are subject to significant revision, if not rejection.

Politically, many of the proposals made in the plans may be difficult to pull off.

The association of governments, which makes planning decisions for six Southland counties, including Orange, said in its new 25-year transportation plan that the region will be $10 billion short of what it needs to maintain its present transportation system and lacking $40 billion to make improvements needed to keep pace with projected population growth.

The plan released Thursday by the association of governments paints a picture of a vast region unable to keep pace with rapid growth in population and jobs.

“The future transportation system is expected to be overwhelmed by new demand,” the plan says.

As a result, there will be worsening congestion, with commuters moving at much slower speeds.

The plan anticipates many tax increases to help pay for maintenance of the existing system and to finance improvements.

Advertisement

The planners said it is crucial for voters in Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties to renew sales tax increases approved decades ago that are scheduled to expire over the next 10 years.

Los Angeles County has a similar transit tax, but it is self-renewing, with no expiration date. Ventura County does not have a special transportation tax, but it will be coming under pressure to add one.

The plan also calls for increases in gasoline taxes and levies on alternative-vehicle fuels, such as natural gas.

As for the high-speed rail project, the proposed 700-mile rail line could cost $25 billion to $33 billion, according to estimates.

On Thursday, the seven-member rail authority hired a planning agency to do an environmental study of its proposed Los Angeles-to-San Diego link through the Inland Empire.

The route would run east from Los Angeles’ Union Station through the San Gabriel Valley to Ontario Airport and Riverside, then turn south, generally following the route of Interstate 15 and 215, through Temecula, Escondido and Mira Mesa to San Diego.

Advertisement

A second proposed route that would go through Orange County emerged as a possibility Thursday when the rail authority decided to go forward with an environmental study of a possible line running along the coast, following the existing rail line used by Amtrak’s San Diegan train.

Rail Authority Has Tight Budget

The plan for the line through Orange County envisions stops in Norwalk, Anaheim, Irvine and Oceanside before trains head to San Diego.

The problem faced by the High-Speed Rail Authority is that it is being kept on an extremely short leash by Gov. Gray Davis and the Legislature.

The authority has $5 million to get it through the year but will have to return to the Legislature for more funding to continue its progress toward development of a complete plan. The authority had asked for $25 million to complete its environmental reviews but was turned down in Sacramento.

The population of Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial counties is projected to increase by 40%, to 22.6 million by 2025, a gain of more than 6 million residents in a quarter-century, according to the document. The number of jobs is expected to grow even faster.

In Orange County, that translates into a population of about 3.4 million by 2025, compared with 2.7 million in 1997, and about 2 million jobs, compared with 1.3 million three years ago.

Advertisement

All of these new residents will create demand for more housing and will inevitably lead to further sprawl, the plan said.

Growth to Result in Longer Commutes

While they foresee a doubling in the number of miles of carpool lanes and construction of more commuter and light-rail lines, planners say the region’s transportation facilities “will not keep pace with the expected 40% population growth.”

The consequence of this growth will cause more pain for commuters, who will see freeway traffic slow to an average 16 mph or less during peak periods, the planners wrote.

The worst traffic congestion and slowest speeds are forecast for the densely populated areas of Los Angeles and Orange counties and on the routes that connect those job-rich areas with outlying areas where housing is less expensive.

One solution to congestion problems in Orange County, the planners said, was building a freeway to Riverside County through the Cleveland National Forest. That would take pressure off the Riverside Freeway, which experiences heavy congestion of commuters from Riverside County going to and from jobs in Orange County. But the proposal would surely trigger a fight between highway advocates and environmental activists.

The draft regional transportation plan leaves unanswered for now a major question: how to handle the region’s anticipated doubling in demand for air travel--from 80 million passengers a year today to 164 million in 2025.

Advertisement

Three of the four scenarios being considered by the regional agency call for an airport at El Toro in Orange County capable of handling as many as 30 million passengers annually by 2025.

“If this region is to be competitive in a global economy, the piece of infrastructure it needs is airports,” said Mark Pisano, the association of governments’ executive director. He repeated his position that there needs to be a fair-share distribution of airport capacity within the region.

But use of El Toro for a major commercial airport is a hotly contested issue in south Orange County. Farther north, plans for a huge expansion of Los Angeles International Airport are generating controversy in areas heavily affected by aircraft.

*

Times staff writer David Haldane contributed to this report.

Advertisement