B-1 Bomber Alternative
“If we don’t build more B-2s we don’t have obvious alternatives,” says Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute [“Military Backers in House Urge Bush to Revive Stealth Program,” Jan. 13].
Thompson goes on to say the B-52 is not stealthy and can’t penetrate hostile airspace and questions how much longer it can fly.
No mention of the B-1 bomber. Why are 96 modern high-performance, penetrating tactical bombers left out of the bomber mix?
The B-1 can fly a few feet off the ground to penetrate hostile territory at near supersonic speed; the B-2 can’t. The B-1 can rush to and escape targets at supersonic speed; the subsonic B-2 can’t. They both have the same sophisticated weapons payload and weapons-delivery systems. Is there a reason to hide the B-1, with its tactical and performance pluses?
KEN JOHNSON
Pinon Hills, Calif.
More to Read
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
