Advertisement

Action Role a Better Fit for Rumsfeld

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld had just settled into his private office aboard the military plane speeding him to Moscow when the phone rang. It was Army Gen. Tommy Franks, the U.S. commander of the Afghanistan campaign, and he had bad news

A helicopter that had rushed into a winter storm to airlift a sick soldier out of Afghanistan was down, and four crew members were injured, stranded in the snows of the Hindu Kush.

“We were trying to figure out what to do,” Rumsfeld recalled later of the subsequent series of phone calls with Franks. “At one point, there was a report [the soldiers] were going to start walking.”

Advertisement

As Rumsfeld arrived at the Kremlin and maneuvered through a series of complex meetings with Russian officials on arms control, he also kept close track of the rescue effort until the helicopter crew and the soldier were finally whisked to safety.

The crisis was a dramatic example of how Rumsfeld’s job has changed since Sept. 11. Until the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the chief concern of the then-maligned Defense secretary was how to sell his ideas for “transforming” the military to meet the theoretical threats of the 21st century.

His president had not proposed a budget commensurate with his ambitions, the military establishment was vexed by his imperious management style, and Congress was alienated by his talk of closing bases and cutting weapon systems.

But since the moment he literally was rocked in his Pentagon office by the impact of a hijacked airliner hitting another part of the massive complex, Rumsfeld has been transformed into a wartime leader faced with real-life threats to U.S. troops suddenly in harm’s way.

The new agenda contrasts dramatically with what had been on Rumsfeld’s plate. And it has dramatically reversed how he is viewed.

“From the minute the plane hit the building and he’s out there wading through the wreckage, that’s Rumsfeld,” said one of his senior aides. “He was active, he was pushing, he was taking charge. That’s just who he is.”

Advertisement

With U.S. troops more than one month into fighting a faraway war against a shadowy enemy, criticism is emerging over how the conflict is being waged. But Rumsfeld has by all accounts remained unshaken. His self-confidence, his indifference to criticism, his unwavering devotion to his vision of how the war should be fought--the very character traits that made him a divisive and infuriating figure when the biggest battles the Pentagon faced were over the budget--are what today have won him support and respect within the military.

He “made it very clear from the early days that we were going to do this war the right way and that it was going to take a long time,” said Stephen Herbits, a Florida-based consultant who has worked for and known Rumsfeld for years. “He said we were going to withstand pressure from critics and take the long view.”

Herbits headed the transition effort in the mid-1970s when Rumsfeld was named Defense secretary for the Ford administration. Herbits assumed the same role when Bush tapped Rumsfeld for a repeat performance last year.

And after the attacks on America, Rumsfeld brought Herbits back to help reorganize his staff to wage war.

“It was somber, it was serious, it was a very tense time,” Herbits said. “Rumsfeld said that everybody had to rethink their jobs because, while you had a lot of long-term planning going on and thinking about the military of the 21st century, suddenly the 21st century was here. That sort of gave people a confidence and a sense of direction and some meaning to how they were going to operate.”

The day of the attacks, while Bush was being shepherded around the country on Air Force One, Rumsfeld was front and center.

Advertisement

“He stuck his head outside his boardroom and said, ‘Does anybody know what’s going on?’ ” recalled Rumsfeld’s spokeswoman, Victoria Clarke. “He didn’t wait for anyone to find out. He jogged down the hallway, went right outside and right over to the crash site.”

Clarke added: “He has this amazing inner gyroscope that tells him exactly what to do at the right time. And his inner gyroscope told him that day to get out there.”

These days, Rumsfeld is the most visible member of President Bush’s war council. Vice President Dick Cheney is often kept under wraps at a secure command post. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell conducts much of his coalition building out of the public eye.

But Rumsfeld is virtually a daily presence. His frequent briefings to the media on the military campaign are described even by his antagonists as “impressive” and “consistent.” In clear language, he usually provides just enough information to slowly advance public understanding of the war even as he guards details of operational planning with stern threats of criminal punishment for anyone who discloses them.

In private conversation, Rumsfeld is extraordinarily quick with a riposte.

To a query about whether U.S. special operation forces in Afghanistan were riding horseback, he said: “They are, in fact, moving from area to area using pack animals and horses.” Then, in a reference to his pre-Sept. 11 efforts to modernize the military, Rumsfeld added with a straight face, “It’s all part of my transformation [plan].”

Even when the demands of his job force him to go long periods with little sleep, he remains absolutely focused. On his recent four-day trip to Moscow, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, India and a U.S. air base in Italy to rally international support for the war effort, he stayed on message at every stop. The U.S. is striking back at the Taliban in self-defense, he told local reporters in each country, all with significant populations of Muslims deeply skeptical of the aims of the war.

Advertisement

Back in Washington, Rumsfeld, 69, starts his days at 6 a.m. and works till well after 8 p.m., walking the long corridors of the Pentagon that he had turned into a museum of military mementos, portraiture and informational displays when he held the Defense post under President Ford.

Rumsfeld talks daily with Franks, who is based in Florida. He meets or talks almost every day with the National Security Council, and often with Powell.

“I would not like to give the impression that he’s picking targets or that there’s an over-obsession with the day-to-day,” said one senior defense official. “He nudges and he cajoles, but he’s much more focused on the direction than he is on the day-to-day managing of the operation.”

The former naval aviator remains fit and invariably wears well-tailored gray suits befitting his wealth--he is a former chairman of G.D. Searle & Co., a pharmaceutical firm, and a multimillionaire. But Rumsfeld, born in a Chicago suburb in 1932 and educated at Princeton University on a scholarship, is more often than not carrying a tattered leather satchel.

“I’m a Depression baby,” he explained to a reporter. “I keep having the zipper fixed.”

Of late, one of Rumsfeld’s major challenges has been to defend the U.S. military’s decision to wage a slow, methodical air campaign while relying heavily on Afghan rebel forces to fight the battles on the ground. Critics warn that the reliance on groups such as the Northern Alliance, which on Friday captured the northern city of Mazur-i-Shariff, only postpones the inevitable need for a major commitment of U.S. ground forces.

Said one senior congressional defense aide: “Since Sept. 11, I have been extremely impressed with [Rumsfeld’s] personal behavior and the way he has conducted himself. But after the first several days of this air campaign, I began to lose respect for how this war is being waged. He is getting and accepting lousy advice.”

Advertisement

A senior defense official offers insight into why Rumsfeld so far has seemed unruffled by such critiques.

“The criticisms of the war are nothing compared with the criticism he was taking before Sept. 11,” the official said. “Rumsfeld is on very, very solid ground, and the fact that he is as patient as he is says something about him. He is not someone who worries about his performance. He worries about the outcome.”

Advertisement