Advertisement

Judge Denies States’ Request to Bring In Microsoft Interviews

Share
REUTERS

Nine states pursuing the antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. suffered a setback Wednesday, when the judge rejected a request to freely introduce transcripts and video of interviews with 18 Microsoft officials, including Chairman Bill Gates.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said the nine states, which are seeking stiff sanctions against Microsoft, should have made their request earlier under a timetable she issued before the hearings began.

“Before the trial started, something should have been said,” said Kollar-Kotelly, who is weighing what remedies should apply against Microsoft for illegally maintaining its Windows monopoly in personal computer operating systems.

Advertisement

A video of Gates almost certainly would prompt comparison with video played during the original Microsoft trial nearly four years ago, in which he appeared uncooperative and quibbled with government lawyers over the meaning of common words.

The judge said she would allow portions of the pre-hearing depositions to be entered during cross-examination of Microsoft employees if the material was touched on in their written testimony. She added that she might make some exceptions.

The nine states, nearing the end of their 16-witness slate, had approached Kollar-Kotelly over the weekend seeking to introduce transcripts and play up to an hour of video in resting their case.

Kollar-Kotelly also is considering whether to endorse a proposed settlement of the case reached between Microsoft and the Justice Department in November.

In court Wednesday, Microsoft lawyer John Warden objected to the introduction of the depositions, saying the software giant would have conducted its defense differently if it had known earlier about the states’ plan.

“There is obviously a clear prejudice when the number of witnesses more than doubles” for the states, Warden said.

Advertisement

Attorneys for the states said they misunderstood the deadline for requesting that the depositions be entered as evidence, thinking they could notify the court within five days of resting their case.

Advertisement