Vacationing Owners Should Have Designated a Contact

Regarding: “Vacationing Owners Lose Their Condo” by Stephen Glassman and Donie Vanitzian (Common Interest Living, June 23): When first reading this, I was appalled at the actions of the association. However, on the second read-through, a few questions came to mind.

Obviously, these are responsible, fairly affluent owners (bought condominium in full, paid major upgrades, decided to take a two-year sailing trip, paying all dues, utilities, taxes, etc., in advance). They made a point of questioning the board about any possible future special assessments (i.e., garage doors and monthly increases) and let the board know about their travel dates.

When the owners returned after two years, of course they were stunned to find that their unit had been sold after lien/foreclosure for nonpayment of “contrived” violations and a garage door assessment. And what a cruel blow that their personal belongings were sold at a “garage sale.”

But I don’t understand why such responsible people felt secure leaving their home for two years without assigning a contact person for emergencies. Anything can happen in a month, let alone two years. What about roof leaks, gas or water breaks?

The board should have been given a qualified contact person, maybe even with power of attorney, for any such communication.

I appreciated the suggestions about “actual notice” being required on such a critical issue, and getting two or even three legal opinions.

CATHEE HICKOK

Canoga Park