Court Rules Tying Inmates to Pole Is Cruel
The Supreme Court on Thursday declared unconstitutional an Alabama prison practice of handcuffing inmates to a metal pole in the summer heat. The court ruled that an inmate could sue over his chaining.
The punishment, revived in that state in 1995 as part of a get-tough program for criminals, is “obvious” cruel and unusual punishment, the court ruled, 6 to 3.
The victory for inmates was partly symbolic. Alabama was the only state to use “hitching posts” in recent years and it has ended the punishments.
But the ruling halts a string of Supreme Court decisions that shielded prison officials from inmate lawsuits. Justices seemed disgusted with treatment of an inmate who claims he was twice chained to an outdoor pole in 1995 and denied food and water as punishment for fighting while on a chain gang.
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority, said the practice “unnecessarily and wantonly inflicted pain.”
The practice was reviewed as part of the broader question of when guards may be sued.
Stevens said officers should have known that the treatment was unconstitutional, and thus can be sued by ex-inmate Larry Hope.
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
