Amtrak Essential to Our Infrastructure

Re “Last Chance for Amtrak,” editorial, April 30: I do not understand how Amtrak “lost” $1.1 billion in 2001. Actually, Amtrak spent that amount, which was one-fifth of what was provided for highways and 15 times less than what was given to airlines. It was not enough to maintain and improve service because over the years Congress has refused to provide the funds and has the wrongheaded idea that Amtrak must be profitable.

The U.S. is the only major country in the world expecting its nationwide railroad system to be profitable. Railroad passenger service is essential and should be fully subsidized by the federal and state governments and an assessment on railroad freight service.

Passenger fares are not cheap, but prices must continue to be reasonable or the crowds won’t come. Compared to the trillions spent on interstate, other highways and airline subsidies since the end of World War II, national passenger service has been cut to the point of erosion of safety. Yet people still take the train, and more are doing so each year. This, in spite of station closings, inconveniences and the need for continued roadway improvement.

I wish David L. Gunn, the new president of Amtrak, the best of luck in not only streamlining management but in selling Congress on the necessity of a superior railroad passenger service and the billions necessary to provide it.

Michael V. Allen

Hawthorne

*

Just six months after our nation’s airports are shut down from coast to coast and fear of flying reaches new heights, how can we even consider defunding Amtrak? Especially the cross-country routes? Just the opposite: Investment in America’s passenger rail system should be increasing.

Our passenger trains are not only America’s heritage but also an essential part of its vital infrastructure. The trains not only move people safely and efficiently, they represent the peace of mind that public transportation can’t be brought to a standstill by 19 fiends with box cutters.

Gene Herd

Sherman Oaks