Advertisement

Lawmakers Voice Doubts on Smallpox Vaccination Plan

Share
Times Staff Writer

With front-line health workers already lining up for inoculation, the first congressional hearing on the Bush administration’s smallpox vaccination policy revealed Wednesday that some lawmakers have serious reservations about the program.

“We need some clearheaded thinking on this,” said Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, the ranking Democrat on a Senate Appropriations subcommittee.

“Are we going in a direction that’s going to siphon off a lot of money for one threat instead of building a system capable of responding to multiple bioterror threats?”

Advertisement

Yes, responded Patrick M. Libbey, executive director of the National Assn. of County and City Health Officials.

“There is much more to [the smallpox program] than lining people up in a mall to get their flu shots,” he said.

Libbey estimated the total costs to local health agencies, including the salaries of those administering the vaccine and the costs of setting up vaccination clinics, at $142 to $220 per person vaccinated. Some counties, he said, were being forced to cut back on childhood immunizations, tuberculosis screening and other health programs.

Iowa health officials said their total costs were $400 per person.

Wednesday’s hearing, which marked the first time Congress has publicly engaged the huge vaccination program that President Bush announced Dec. 13, highlighted the unusual lack of congressional oversight.

But because the new program will ultimately be carried out in most congressional districts, lawmakers are connected to it more directly than they are to other federal policies they debate and vote on.

The first phase of the program, a plan to vaccinate up to 450,000 health-care workers who would be the first to treat any smallpox cases, got off to a shaky start last Friday. On Wednesday, Los Angeles County began its vaccination of up to 9,200 health-care workers.

Advertisement

Phase 2 of the program calls for the vaccination of as many as 10 million police, fire and emergency personnel.

Despite months of careful planning by federal health agencies, states and local authorities are finding that the program presents numerous challenges.

Doctors and nurses have to be educated and trained, clinics have to be organized, and health-care workers have to take time off from their regular jobs to administer the vaccine.

On top of that, at least 80 hospitals nationwide have decided not to participate, and untold numbers of health-care workers are declining to volunteer for the vaccine because they are concerned about its risks and, in most cases, have no guarantee they will be compensated if they are injured or have to take time off work to recover from the vaccine’s side effects.

Several labor unions and public health organizations and some members of Congress have called on the administration to delay implementation until some of the compensation issues can be resolved.

On Wednesday, the National Governors’ Assn. added its voice to those calling for more time and money.

Advertisement

“Smallpox preparedness, as important as it may be, cannot be accomplished at the expense of transferring dollars away from other public health bioterrorism preparedness activities or any other existing public health program,” the governors’ group said in a statement.

Yet 58% of county and city health officials who responded to a survey by Libbey’s group reported being forced to make such shifts.

All the senators attending Wednesday’s hearing reported that public health officials, hospital administrators and citizens have expressed concerns about the program.

“Wherever I go in my state, people are concerned about funding” for the program, said Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.).

“The questions I get all the time are, one, What is the risk of this happening? and two, How are we going to pay for this?” said Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.). Federal officials did not provide much information about the risk of a smallpox attack.

“Some of the information is classified,” said Dr. Julie L. Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “but [the risk] is not zero.... . We have to be prepared for the unthinkable.”

Advertisement

Specter, the subcommittee chairman, asked Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, if he had any information about which countries, if any, might have stocks of the smallpox virus.

“No,” Fauci said.

“Well, we need to make the intelligence available to the country, if there is any,” Specter said. “We need to get a better assessment on the risk” of attacks.

The substantial costs and headaches associated with the program are worth it, Gerberding said.

“Our goal is to insure sufficient preparedness capacity” for a potential attack, she said.

“The investments we’re making” in the smallpox program “will serve us well” in other public health emergencies.

Advertisement