Advertisement

Ashcroft’s Parting Gift: a Call for Strict Sentencing

Share

So, departing Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft is warning that a recent Supreme Court decision could lead to more lenient treatment of violent offenders (Feb. 2). Ashcroft calls on Congress to enact even tougher federal sentencing guidelines to obviate what he calls “a retreat from justice that may put the public’s safety in jeopardy.” Reminds me of another famous Republican legislator who said years ago that “extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Leniency in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Thank you, Sen. Barry Goldwater, for that timeless admonition. Seems Ashcroft believes it as well.

Joseph A. Lea

Mission Viejo

*

Ashcroft’s call for harsher sentencing policies in light of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision on federal guidelines is misguided and counterproductive. Though Ashcroft contends that violent crime has declined because “the criminals who would have victimized ... were serving tough sentences,” in fact only 13% of federal prisoners have been convicted of a violent offense. More than half (55%) of federal prisoners are incarcerated for a drug offense, a consequence of the prosecution-oriented war on drugs of the last two decades. Data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission demonstrate that the majority of federal crack and powder cocaine offenders are low-level offenders, incarcerated at a cost of $22,000 annually per prisoner.

The Supreme Court decision making federal guidelines advisory rather than mandatory restores appropriate balance to the sentencing process. In the weeks following the decision, judges are still consulting the guidelines penalty structure but now have the ability to sentence at a level higher or lower than the guidelines based on individual circumstances.

Advertisement

Ashcroft’s fear of overly lenient judges is curious because most federal judges have been appointed by Republican administrations. Rather than call for immediate congressional action on sentencing, it would be far wiser to analyze the impact of the new sentencing structure over time and only make modifications as necessary.

Marc Mauer

Assistant Director

The Sentencing Project

Washington

Advertisement